Yes, i keep relating to SR because that is (fundamentally) what you are undermining with your theory. Furthermore you are also breaking General relativity, Maxwells equations, the standard model and basically the whole foundation of physics.
Just to address a point:
0=1.
Ok now to address question 4. You are asking a philosophical question here, is maths discovered or invented?
Now of course you will shout 'INVENTED' because well, it kind of is. However this does not dismiss all of mathematics to be of human invention. Logic can be found everywhere independent of human intervention.
Secondly Maxwell did not just 'stumble' onto some set of equations that just 'so happened to fit' Faraday findings. They were formulated through mathematical rigor. It was
supported by Faradays findings, thats the difference
To address point 5, im not sure what you're getting at. This 'box' is exactly what a reference frame means, you observe from inside your 'box' at your velocity from your point in time...
And about SR, prove that it contradicts reality and your theory does not.
Im not sure what this k value you speak of is either