The Student Room Group

Edexcel FP1 Thread - 20th May, 2016

Scroll to see replies

Hi does anyone know please whether all the mad as maths questions under ellipse are in the spec? http://madasmaths.com/archive/maths_booklets/further_topics/various/conic_sections.pdf Thanks :smile:
Original post by economicss
Hi does anyone know please whether all the mad as maths questions under ellipse are in the spec? http://madasmaths.com/archive/maths_booklets/further_topics/various/conic_sections.pdf Thanks :smile:


Ellipses? You don't do ellipses in FP1, do you?
Original post by Zacken
Ellipses? You don't do ellipses in FP1, do you?

I don't think so, I think I'm paranoid haha, is it just parabolas and rectangular hyperbola that we need to be able to do for FP1? Thanks :smile:
Original post by economicss
I don't think so, I think I'm paranoid haha, is it just parabolas and rectangular hyperbola that we need to be able to do for FP1? Thanks :smile:


Yep, just those two are on spec.
Thank you!
Original post by Zacken
Yep, just those two are on spec.
http://madasmaths.com/archive/maths_booklets/further_topics/various/conic_sections.pdf
http://madasmaths.com/archive/maths_booklets/further_topics/various/proof_by_induction.pdf
http://madasmaths.com/archive/maths_booklets/further_topics/various/series_summation_practice.pdf
http://madasmaths.com/archive/maths_booklets/further_topics/various/complex_numbers_part_1.pdf
http://madasmaths.com/archive/maths_booklets/further_topics/various/complex_numbers_part_1_exam_questions.pdf
http://madasmaths.com/archive/maths_booklets/further_topics/linear_algebra/matrices_exam_questions_part_a.pdf

Here are all the relevant (to FP1) madasmaths booklets which I was able to pick out! Thought the direct links would be more useful than trying to search for them all manually. Maybe there are a few more I have missed, but these are what I have found! Many thanks to @TeeEm - These work booklets are absolutely amazing revision for someone such as myself who has finished all of the actual examination papers! Many thanks!!
Hi, I was doing the June 2014 R paper and got stuck on knowing how many assumptions to make for the proof of question 9 (b). Can someone please explain the question to me?
Original post by Glavien
Hi, I was doing the June 2014 R paper and got stuck on knowing how many assumptions to make for the proof of question 9 (b). Can someone please explain the question to me?


You need only assume that:

uk=4k+12k+3u_{k} = 4^{k+1} - 2^{k+3} and uk1=4k2k+2u_{k-1} = 4^k - 2^{k+2}.

Then: uk+1=6uk8uk1=u_{k+1} = 6u_{k} - 8u_{k-1} = \cdots where you substitute in from above.

Since it's a recurrence relation involving three terms, you need to make two assumptions. When there is only two terms, you make 1 assumption, etc...
Original post by Zacken
You need only assume that:

uk=4k+12k+3u_{k} = 4^{k+1} - 2^{k+3} and uk1=4k2k+2u_{k-1} = 4^k - 2^{k+2}.

Then: uk+1=6uk8uk1=u_{k+1} = 6u_{k} - 8u_{k-1} = \cdots where you substitute in from above.

Since it's a recurrence relation involving three terms, you need to make two assumptions. When there is only two terms, you make 1 assumption, etc...


Gotcha, thanks!
Original post by Glavien
Gotcha, thanks!


Cheers. :biggrin:
Just under 3 weeks left . . .
Hi, please could anyone explain question 4e on exercise A here https://644625398389466aee00633223056f55519d5fbc.googledrive.com/host/0B1ZiqBksUHNYQWY1UWtNa0NRNU0/CH5.pdf I can't really make sense of SB, thanks :smile:
Original post by economicss
Hi, please could anyone explain question 4e on exercise A here https://644625398389466aee00633223056f55519d5fbc.googledrive.com/host/0B1ZiqBksUHNYQWY1UWtNa0NRNU0/CH5.pdf I can't really make sense of SB, thanks :smile:


Okay, so - first off, you can see in includes just odd numbers - in fact, it's two consecutive odd numbers multiplied together.

So, the general term is: (2n+1)(2n+3)(2n+1)(2n+3), you want to add up these except starting from 3 * 5, so you need to start from n=1n=1.

Hence: r=1k(2n+1)(2n+3)=(3)(5)+(5)(7)++(2k+1)(2k+3)\sum_{r=1}^{k} (2n+1)(2n+3) = (3)(5) + (5)(7) + \cdots+ (2k+1)(2k+3) and there are precisely kk terms in this summation, as required.
Original post by Zacken
Okay, so - first off, you can see in includes just odd numbers - in fact, it's two consecutive odd numbers multiplied together.

So, the general term is: (2n+1)(2n+3)(2n+1)(2n+3), you want to add up these except starting from 3 * 5, so you need to start from n=1n=1.

Hence: r=1k(2n+1)(2n+3)=(3)(5)+(5)(7)++(2k+1)(2k+3)\sum_{r=1}^{k} (2n+1)(2n+3) = (3)(5) + (5)(7) + \cdots+ (2k+1)(2k+3) and there are precisely kk terms in this summation, as required.


Ah I see, brilliant, thank you :smile:
Original post by economicss
Ah I see, brilliant, thank you :smile:


Cheers.
Hey guys,

I am really stuck on practice paper a Qu 5 in this link:

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=72187&d=1244566570

Surely it is impossible to part a before part b as u can't find the real root
Original post by J.M.Keynes
Hey guys,

I am really stuck on practice paper a Qu 5 in this link:

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=72187&d=1244566570

Surely it is impossible to part a before part b as u can't find the real root


Huh? You know two roots and you know the constant term.

You know that if three roots are of a cubic are α,β,γ\alpha, \beta, \gamma then αβγ=102\alpha \beta \gamma = \frac{10}{2} (in this case).

You know αβ=(3+i)(3i)\alpha \beta = (3+i)(3-i) so γ=102αβ\gamma = \frac{10}{2\alpha \beta}
How can I expand this out if A and B are both matrices? I know that the order of multiplying matrices matters, so is there a particular way to know which way to order the matrices?
M=(A+B)(2AB)\mathbf{M} = (\mathbf{A+\mathbf{B}})(2\mathbf{A-\mathbf{B}})

Its from the June 2014 R paper, question 6.
Original post by Glavien
How can I expand this out if A and B are both matrices? I know that the order of multiplying matrices matters, so is there a particular way to know which way to order the matrices?
M=(A+B)(2AB)\mathbf{M} = (\mathbf{A+\mathbf{B}})(2\mathbf{A-\mathbf{B}})

Its from the June 2014 R paper, question 6.


You could just work out each bracket numerically and multiply, but if you do expand keep the order the same from left to right, so (A+B)(2AB)=2A2+2BAABB2(A + B)(2A - B) = 2A^2 +2BA - AB - B^2
Original post by NotNotBatman
You could just work out each bracket numerically and multiply, but if you do expand keep the order the same from left to right, so (A+B)(2AB)=2A2+2BAABB2(A + B)(2A - B) = 2A^2 +2BA - AB - B^2


Thanks!


Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending