Why STEM is objectively superior to non STEM degrees.

There is a lot of creativity and problem-solving involved when you are programming something or solving a complex maths problem.

ofc not lol

You memorise the methods, right? Without the methods, how would you solve the problem? You can't use 'creativity' to solve a maths problem.

how insecure must you be about your career prospects to have to make this thread and reassure yourself?

You're a troll but for the benefit of others, this STEM superiority attitude is nonsense that isn't really that common in reality. And before you accuse me of being a butthurt non-STEMMER, I've done a STEM Master's degree and am starting a STEM PhD in October.

Society needs the whole range of subjects and disciplines to function and be vibrant.

You dont just memorise, you understand, think logically. You cant memorise and expect even a 2:2 degree. You have to think logically.

At uni level, it isnt applying a method, its about how that has come about. The logic required isnt something a non STEM degree can teach you.

You are probably unable to fathom the depths to which you a STEM degree goes to since you use the word 'memorise' when in reality you're actually understanding core fundamentals of a subject, processing it and applying it. You dont go into the depth that a non STEM degree does and thats why STEM degrees are preferred for jobs where a specific degree subject isnt needed (e.g. Investment banking)

You mean as you do with every other subject?

This is not 'objective'. This is subjective. I mean, you're not even at university! How much can you really know about the matter?

Better question: Why are you so salty about it?

As i said, you cant fathom the depth that a science subject goes into.

It isnt subjective. Using your logic, a non STEM subject is as valuable as a STEM subject because they both give reasoning skills and problem solving skills. But clearly employers prefer a STEM subject over a non STEM one because of STEM is more respectable in this sense; The core skills taught is more in depth.

Im not salty, you chose to reply not me.

You dont just memorise, you understand, think logically. You cant memorise and expect even a 2:2 degree. You have to think logically.

At uni level, it isnt applying a method, its about how that has come about. The logic required isnt something a non STEM degree can teach you.

You are probably unable to fathom the depths to which you a STEM degree goes to since you use the word 'memorise' when in reality you're actually understanding core fundamentals of a subject, processing it and applying it. You dont go into the depth that a non STEM degree does and thats why STEM degrees are preferred for jobs where a specific degree subject isnt needed (e.g. Investment banking)

As i said, you cant fathom the depth that a science subject goes into.

It isnt subjective. Using your logic, a non STEM subject is as valuable as a STEM subject because they both give reasoning skills and problem solving skills. But clearly employers prefer a STEM subject over a non STEM one because of STEM is more respectable in this sense; The core skills taught is more in depth.

Im not salty, you chose to reply not me.

Why do you even care about what other people do?

Didn't you bring up the art of memorising with your comment about Law Degrees?

It's not as if you started this thread not wanting a reply.

So you accept im right. Good.

I dont care what individuals do, just making a statement; STEM degrees are objectively better than non STEM degrees.

So what was the point in making this thread? To make yourself feel better than other people? To make other people feel bad?

I dont care what individuals do, just making a statement; STEM degrees are objectively better than non STEM degrees.

Law is mostly memorising and learning things by heart but certain aspects like some game theory (prisoners dilemma etc) require skills that are more logical. So you definitely need to be intelligent to do Law and isnt on the same level as something like Sociology.

-Hasn't done anything remotely similar to law
-Makes a claim which has no basis at all
-Thinks he knows it all.

The self-validation is strong.

Posted from TSR Mobile