Predicted 25 Marker Philosophy Q's Anyone else have different predictions?
1A) Explain Plato's Analogy of the cave 2A) Explain concept of 'Creatio ex nihlo' 3A) Explain Paley's version of the Teleological (Design) argument 4A) Pending
did anyone else talk about hume in 3b because i did and not sure if its right now lol
I did, I talked about the judaeo christian god allowing natural evil as a punishment or to build divine qualities, then moral evil as a result of free will to take away free will being an unjust and unloving thing to do as man would be like slaves. Then I spoke about the prime move being perfect therefore a good god but unaware of evil as it would detract from perfection to think about anything else rather than its self as it said A GOD not a judaeo christian god
I did, I talked about the judaeo christian god allowing natural evil as a punishment or to build divine qualities, then moral evil as a result of free will to take away free will being an unjust and unloving thing to do as man would be like slaves. Then I spoke about the prime move being perfect therefore a good god but unaware of evil as it would detract from perfection to think about anything else rather than its self as it said A GOD not a judaeo christian god
I looked at the 2009 examiner report for the question "explain irenaues' theodicy" and it said candidates who related it to hick were credited so all good.
Lol. If you wanted to talk about Plantinga and Gaunilo in the 25 marker, you won't get marked down for it. You needed to make sure you definitely evaluated their arguments in A02 though.
Lol. If you wanted to talk about Plantinga and Gaunilo in the 25 marker, you won't get marked down for it. You needed to make sure you definitely evaluated their arguments in A02 though.
Yeah his secound ontological argument in Proslogion chapter 3, was a response to Gainilo's criticism about the island anyway. I don't know why someone said it wasn't.
You'd get marks for it so long as for the most part you mentioned Anselm and didn't spend the whole toe talking about Ganilo
Those who think you dont get marked if you mentioned Gaunilo in the Anselm question and also those who have a misconception that Anselms second argument was formed after Gaunilo's critisim, check out the examiners report on the same question in June 2010.
Those who think you dont get marked if you mentioned Gaunilo in the Anselm question and also those who have a misconception that Anselms second argument was formed after Gaunilo's critisim, check out the examiners report on the same question in June 2010.
I've found two different opinions from past mark schemes so I'm posed in a difficult position.
I've found two different opinions from past mark schemes so I'm posed in a difficult position.
I'm pretty sure that he wrote his second argument at the same time at his first it was simply another justification. They were both in Proslogian I think. You could see his second argument as a response but he didn't see Gaunilo's work and write another argument based on that it's just that Gaunilo never noticed his second argument haha!
I'm pretty sure that he wrote his second argument at the same time at his first it was simply another justification. They were both in Proslogian I think. You could see his second argument as a response but he didn't see Gaunilo's work and write another argument based on that it's just that Gaunilo never noticed his second argument haha!
Just for any of you guys wondering here is a recap of the Questions in the Exam (I believe), hope it helps:
Questions in OCR As Philosophy Exam 2016: 1. a) Describe Anselm's Ontological Argument to prove the existence of God b) 'God's existence isn't logically necessary'-Discuss 2. a) Explain how Kant used the existence of morality to postulate the existence of God b) 'morality is a psychological need, not a proof of God's existence.' Discuss. 3.a) How does Iraneus' theodicy justify natural and moral evil in the world b) 'A good God doesn't exist as there is evil in the World'-Discuss 4. a) Explain why the existence of Irreducible Complexity in some molecules implies an intelligent designer b) To what extent is irreducible complexity a creationist delusion