The Student Room Group

This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

.....

Scroll to see replies

Original post by iMacJack
Yea, 64/75 not too bad for what everyone is finding a very hard paper


At least we tried out best right Mr D would be proud ?

Now for everyone that feels they did bad here is the annual Hitler reacts video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1zXCvs_mFk
Original post by iMacJack
well done mate :smile:

aaran got 75/75, unsurprisingly, he deserved it though to be fair
#

Yeah but @kingaaran cheated
Reply 22
Original post by Yunique
Thoughts??


standard paper in my opinion, bit harder than the more recent ones.
Original post by TeeEm
Standard paper


Meh - it was harder than last years I am sure
Looks like a solid 69/75.

Haha...69.
75/75 for me then... As usual
Thanks so much! Phew I think I dropped about 13 odd marks, hope for an A still then. I hope everyone is pleasantly surprised
Original post by magicrazzaq
75/75 for me then... As usual


Congrats bro. Retake or First Time?
Reply 28
73/75 like I thought. I put too little effort in this module. Glad it's done.
Also Arsey made the same mistake loads made by not rounding sqrt (5)
Original post by Arsey
Here are my solutions to the FP1 paper.

Reasonable paper I thought, a few tricky bits


grade boundaries predictions?
Reply 30
Original post by magicrazzaq
75/75 for me then... As usual


I8.jpg
For question 7e, would just saying they are parallel with proof get 1 mark or two? Thanks :smile:
Best of luck to everyone for C2 - should be easier than this paper
For the geometrical relationship. shouldnt we be talking about the transformation?
Reply 34
@Princepieman


I know how you're feeIing, I'm here for you if you ever wanna taIk
The question said 'using this value for a' - if we used say, a= '1' instead of -1, would we get the following 8 marks?
Original post by carly1999
For describing the geometrical relationship of the line segments, would you lose a mark for calculating the gradients and saying they were parallel, but not stating one was twice the length of the other?


Probably yes, it was a 2 mark question
Thank you Arsey! 61/75 not too bad :smile:
Reply 38
I plotted R as +5 not -5 (somehow) and stated they were perpendicular. So 2/3 for argand part and 0/2 for the following part I assume?
Reply 39
Original post by iMacJack
Best of luck to everyone for C2 - should be easier than this paper


:angry::unimpressed::bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling::bawling:

Latest

Trending

Trending