The Student Room Group

Is this picture disgusting or beautiful?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20
Original post by ivybridge
Well, it isn't supposed to be sexual and attractive, pal.


"disgustiung or beautiful"...
Would rather not see it though
Original post by EllainKahlo
Neither. In my honest opinion, you shouldn't be posting pictures of your kids naked or semi-naked online. One, they haven't consented and it could very well be embarrassing for them in the future and two, people can take and do what they will with those images. Especially sick people. It's not hard for any one of us to copy and paste the image.


As the BBC have shown.
Reply 23
Original post by Ciel.
There'd be nothing wrong with it IF the father had some underwear on.


I don't think you could tell from the angle if the father is wearing briefs, and if he was wearing Boxer Briefs you would have to look real hard to notice.
Original post by M14B
I would never imagine to get into the shower with my naked father


As a baby or a toodler not like that baby is a grown man?
Reply 25
Original post by inhuman
"disgustiung or beautiful"...


beautiful != sexual
Original post by DanteTheDoorWot
Would rather not see it though


Shoot I spoke to soon huh? How did they figure it out?
Reply 27
Pretty much neutral. Although the story behind it makes it more positive I suppose.
Original post by inhuman
"disgustiung or beautiful"...


Yeah, check your terms in this context, pal.
It kind of disturbs me- the father should maybe put some clothes on.
Original post by inhuman
Way too hairy, I find it a bit off-putting tbh.


No one asked for your opinion on the male's appearance...

Because that's totally the most important thing...
Original post by DanteTheDoorWot
Would rather not see it though


And why not?? I think people are disturbed in their head if they feel some sort of way.
Original post by xobeauty
Shoot I spoke to soon huh? How did they figure it out?


They didn't, they just decided to ban anyway. I'm a careful man no way I left anything
Original post by M14B
I would never imagine to get into the shower with my naked father


That would be because of your age. Seriously, people on this thread act like this is rocket science.
Original post by DanteTheDoorWot
They didn't, they just decided to ban anyway. I'm a careful man no way I left anything


You better get your **** together mister
Reply 35
Original post by z33
beautiful != sexual


I said it's offputting. It's not outright disgusting, but not really beautiful either...
Reply 36
Original post by TeenPolyglot
No one asked for your opinion on the male's appearance...

Because that's totally the most important thing...


"Is this picture disgusting or beautiful?"

It's disgusting then. Better?
It's not beautiful but not disgusting either.
Reply 38
Original post by ivybridge
Why? Like, seriously. You all create your own stereotype then cry about feminism. Hilarious.


What stereotype? And I don't cry about feminism, I'm freaking gay and I support feminists lol (to a certain extent). It just gives me creeps because it looks like his privates are touching the child's body, I don't like it. It'd be the same if it was a naked woman. It's not about the gender of the naked person - it's just that I don't think it is appropriate to bath/shower naked with your child after the child reaches a certain age.
(edited 7 years ago)
Reply 39
Original post by ivybridge
Yeah, check your terms in this context, pal.


Check the question.

OP asked a question, I answered it. Don't get your panties in a wad just because I did not take the same interpretation of the question or the photograph (as a piece of art) than others.

I can just as well say about a famous painting it looks ****, meanwhile critics might argue the beautiful use of technique...yadda yadda yadda. Get the point?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending