Is this picture disgusting or beautiful?

I don't think you could tell from the angle if the father is wearing briefs, and if he was wearing Boxer Briefs you would have to look real hard to notice.

You better get your **** together mister

Check the question.

OP asked a question, I answered it. Don't get your panties in a wad just because I did not take the same interpretation of the question or the photograph (as a piece of art) than others.

I can just as well say about a famous painting it looks ****, meanwhile critics might argue the beautiful use of technique...yadda yadda yadda. Get the point?

I said it's offputting. It's not outright disgusting, but not really beautiful either...

What stereotype? And I don't cry about feminism, I'm freaking gay and I support feminists lol (to a certain extent). It just gives me creeps because it looks like his privates are touching the child's body, I don't like it. It'd be the same if it was a naked woman. It's not about the gender of the naked person - it's just that I don't think it is appropriate to bath/shower naked with your child after the child reaches a certain age.

No because you have no point. You check the question. My issue isn't your opinion its the fact its backing is absolutely ludicrous and based on a blatant and deliberate 'misinterpretation' of the question and article.

@ivybridge said
Well, it isn't supposed to be sexual and attractive, pal.and you replied with

"disgustiung or beautiful"...

so I said

beautiful != sexual because you seemed to imply that it does due to your response to that post

got nuffin to do with your opinion of the pic in question

"Is this picture disgusting or beautiful?"

It's disgusting then. Better?

The OP is asking our opinion on whether the picture is disgusting or beautiful. I said it's off putting, I gave a reason why. He did not ask if the scene was beautiful (the scene being a father comforting his child), he (or she) said picture. I gave my opinion about that.

The only reason there is so much debate here is because some people chose to sexualize the photo, complain about it, and the media got a hold of it. Otherwise you lot wouldn't even make a fuss.

Still, though, it is obvious that you are referring to the male's appearance, as you've already stated your reasoning.

Sorry to be facetious but, you know, TSR standards.

Yes, that is your opinion that is fine

And yes I agree I didn't say I disagreed with anything you just posted BUT

you seemed to imply it was sexual in that post in reply to ivybridge's "it's not meant to be sexual" post to which you quotes the title. So I clarified beautiful != sexual. Das it.

That picture should come with a health warning because I vomited all over my keyboard.

Why is this pedophile agenda being shoved down our throats? Why are grown men posting naked pics of themselves with little children on social media? There are so many questions I have so many questions for the mother... Was she the one taking this pic? Did she green light this for him to post online?


I just came back from watching X-men Apocalypse and there was pedophilic overtones in the movie too with how Jean Grey is so much younger than ol' man Logan yet the producers of the movie thought it was okay for a man more than twice the age of a 15 year old have a 'sexual awakening' with her.

You being gay has no relevance to male stereotypes and feminism.

The child is a toddler. He's young enough. The kid was sick. And your mind is clearly amiss there if that's what you thought when looking; how disturbing.

You being gay has no relevance to male stereotypes and feminism.

The child is a toddler. He's young enough. The kid was sick. And your mind is clearly amiss there if that's what you thought when looking; how disturbing.

Yes and I pointed out that I wasn't looking at it sexually.

When I look at a cute dog and say omg he is so beautiful, does that mean I want to **** the dog? If I see something nasty on food and say that's off putting does that mean I don't want to eat the food or I don't want to **** the food?

In fact, what is going on here is that y'all minds so nasty, y'all immediately thought I was talking sexually. That's y'alls problem, not mine.

I don't see anything wrong with it.

It was a father comforting his sick child, whom he had to carry into the shower to reduce his temperature.

It's society whom has to sexualise everything, as per usual.