Why do leftists love Islam?

No "upper class" person would dream of referring to themselves as "upper class". I think he might mean "nouveau riche".

Religions were not made by anybody. They are the result of human development.

I responded to your statement that followers of "non peaceful" religions (or believers into "non peaceful" faith) are peaceful people. For me it sounds as nonsense.

They were made... that's why they exist. Granted, most likely not by a single person, but a collective.

I said that most people who follow religions are probably peaceful, but the religions themselves are not peaceful. There are also some very aggressive and violent people who follow religions. How is it non-nonsensical to suggest that there are peaceful people following non-peaceful religions. They simply cherry pick the parts they believe in and go about their way.

Pretty obvious stuff in my opinion.

Then name some of these evil little green creatures and whose directives they performed. People have the right to know the truth.

Yeah, all parts of religious scripts are equally sacred, but some parts are more sacred than others. (~C)

Left wing thought is inherently totalitarian.

I think that the explanation is quite simple.
In a display of ironic racism, they conflate "Muslims" with "Brown Foreigners" and so take the position that any criticism of their ideology is a form of cultural imperialism.

In some respects, there is no difference between religion and extreme political ideology. The both require a suspension of critical faculties and the ability to see any criticism as reason for taking offence They both make good use of pejorative terms to describe their critics in an attempt to demonise them. A regressive-left SJW would rather eat their own babies than be publicly accused of racism. And that is what often happens to people who raise concerns about issues like slavery, domestic violence and misogyny in the Quran.

There are two ideologies.

One says "you didn't ask to be born into this world, but at least you have your own body. It's yours, you can do whatever you want with it. Prostitute it, harm it, improve it, exploit it, love it, whatever. It's yours.

The other says "you didn't ask to be born into this world, but you still have an obligation to use your body to promote your family's beliefs and your country's values. I made you so I own you, I can tell you what to do to yourself."

Which one sounds more totalitarian?

Why do alt righters love saying "libtard" "cuck" and "normies" ?

I made so I own you is inherently totalitarian. Islam preaches it, do as I wish, or you will burn in fires of hell goes the dogma. North Korea seems quite tame by comparison.

The former isn't, but then neither is it particularly left wing. Left wing regimes, from the Jacobins down to modern China, feel THEY can tell you what to do with your body better than you. It exists for the state, for the leader,