Hi Everyone,
I have an issue currently on going with my university society, which may seem quite trivial, however has caused me a lot of worry over the past few weeks, and I was hoping I could get some opinions on it.
I'm a fully paid up member of one of Manchester University's societies and have been fora few years now. All the societies are run by the students union. I have an issue where an abusive ex-partner, who is not a member of the society, or the students, or studying or affiliated with the university in any way, is wanting to come on an official society weekend trip.
After the abuse happened a few years ago, I sought professional advice and cut them out of my life entirely, blocking their regular emails and texts and all other forms of communication I could come up with. I did everything possible to never be anywhere they were likely to be, but they would find out where I would be, cinema, weekends away, even my birthday and turn up, knowingly uninvited. This has not happened fora few years, however I am very worried this is the start of another bout of it again. Obviously I would not be able to go on this trip,were my ex-partner present.
I have brought up my concerns with the committee of the society a number of times through facebook, email and in person. I have sent then evidence in the form of chat logs and emails, and talked through what happened, which I had hoped never to have to go over again.
The comittee have told me in no uncertain terms that they are unwilling to even ask my ex-partner not to go, let alone tell them. As they are not a member of the society I cannot see either logic or equity in this. The society's constitution has the following lines about members:
3.3 All members will be treated equally and fairly.
3.4 All members will be eligible to go on club trips or take part in club activities.
It seems to me that both of these sections are being broken by giving preference to a non-member, especially with the demonstrable issues they have caused in the past. No part of the constitution mentions non-members rights at all. The only explanation I have had from the committee is that they want to treat us both 'equally', however this is part of the problem, as they are not treating us both 'fairly'.
I had asked them to seek confirmation from the students union about this, as I was sure they would advise differently. I have just had an email back from the committee to say the SU has agreed with their decision. I only have the word of the committee on this, and the email does not say what was said, or ask me to provide details to the SU. It feels more like a brush off.
Apologies for the wall of text, however I thought it best to be thorough and accurate.
Does anyone think I have a case to go to the students union, or the university about this, ideally to try to get the result reversed, or else just to make an official complaint? I was thinking I could email the SU with full details in case I was mis-represented to them by the committee, but I would be worried about them brushing this off again to save them time and effort. Would it be worth CCing into the email any other people at the university? Is there anywhere else you can think that I can take this? Is it just a case that the committee can do what they want, even if it goes against the constitution?
Any advice is much appreciated.