The Student Room Group

2016 Official AQA New Spec AS Level Physics Paper 1 - 24th of May 2016

Scroll to see replies

Reply 820
Original post by JTawn
I put:
(1,0)n --> (1,-1)P + (0, 1)e+ + (0,0)Ve

I think that's the same?


same here
Would you still get the mark if you said beta plus instead of e+?
Original post by wolvan
same here


Can someone help why does the positron have a 1 at the bottom??
Right, I'm going to create a skype group in order to get the unofficial mark scheme sorted? Send me a message of skype names and ill add you and then add you to the group
Original post by CrazyFool229
Such mixed reactions from what I've heard... A lot found it "not bad", a lot found it hard, and just a few found it easy... Personally I found the questions to be a lot more abstract especially the engine one and the chocolate bar question compared to past exam papers. Definitely more "application" based physics (Which is good, but I REALLY hate it because I do well in tests that is fundamentally rote learning rather than applications). It was certainly better than the Specimen papers though.

Also, did anyone put C as the bungee cord? I put D down at first but I thought surely you don't want it to stretch that much and you want it to have a certain amount of strength rather than just completely stretching?

I reckon the boundaries will be relatively standard.

Also, did people get a small force for the Young's Modulus/Stress question?


I also put C for the bungee cord and got something like 21 for the stress I think
Reply 825
Original post by BainesyA
Right, I'm going to create a skype group in order to get the unofficial mark scheme sorted? Send me a message of skype names and ill add you and then add you to the group


we already have the google doc setting up
Original post by JamesHaines
I also put C for the bungee cord and got something like 21 for the stress I think


I seem to remember get 23N
Original post by wolvan
we already have the google doc setting up


I was in there for a second and everyone was messing about?
Original post by wolvan
we already have the google doc setting up


thank you
Original post by zebra249
Would you still get the mark if you said beta plus instead of e+?


Yh
Original post by zebra249
Would you still get the mark if you said beta plus instead of e+?


In the specimen paper it had a question with electron emission and it was given as beta minus not e minus. Since the spec paper is the closet thing to our exam I would e+ is correct
Reply 831
Original post by BainesyA
I was in there for a second and everyone was messing about?


not anymore, owner restricted editing powers

link to site
For the frequency question of the microwaves I did this:
The wavelength was 12 cm => 0.12 m
f = c/wavelength. => f = 3 x 10^8/0.12 = 2.5 x 10^9 Hz
But that chocolate was kept in the microwave for one minute (60 seconds).
Frequency is waves per second so:
2.5 x 10^9/60 = 4.17 x 10^7 Hz (to 3sf).

Is this right?
Original post by LightAtTheEnd
For the frequency question of the microwaves I did this:
The wavelength was 12 cm => 0.12 m
f = c/wavelength. => f = 3 x 10^8/0.12 = 2.5 x 10^9 Hz
But that chocolate was kept in the microwave for one minute (60 seconds).
Frequency is waves per second so:
2.5 x 10^9/60 = 4.17 x 10^7 Hz (to 3sf).

Is this right?


I don't think time needed to be included because it specified it was only "about a minute"
Original post by BainesyA
I seem to remember get 23N


I remember I got 23 too
Original post by LightAtTheEnd
For the frequency question of the microwaves I did this:
The wavelength was 12 cm => 0.12 m
f = c/wavelength. => f = 3 x 10^8/0.12 = 2.5 x 10^9 Hz
But that chocolate was kept in the microwave for one minute (60 seconds).
Frequency is waves per second so:
2.5 x 10^9/60 = 4.17 x 10^7 Hz (to 3sf).

Is this right?


This seems like the best answer I have seen so far for warranting the full 5 marks. I dont even remember seeing that is was in for one minute. Therefore I got your answer before you multiplied by 60.

(Also I used 0.118m)
Original post by JamesHaines
I don't think time needed to be included because it specified it was only "about a minute"

Perhaps but just one question. In either case the frequency is quite high and I was under the misconception that microwaves have relatively small frequencies and high wavelength?
I still dunno if its nodes or antinodes and why. :s-smilie:
Original post by LightAtTheEnd
For the frequency question of the microwaves I did this:
The wavelength was 12 cm => 0.12 m
f = c/wavelength. => f = 3 x 10^8/0.12 = 2.5 x 10^9 Hz
But that chocolate was kept in the microwave for one minute (60 seconds).
Frequency is waves per second so:
2.5 x 10^9/60 = 4.17 x 10^7 Hz (to 3sf).

Is this right?


I forgot this bit so probably lost 2. Looks fine.
Original post by BainesyA
This seems like the best answer I have seen so far for warranting the full 5 marks. I dont even remember seeing that is was in for one minute. Therefore I got your answer before you multiplied by 60.

(Also I used 0.118m)


If you use c=f*wavelength you already get frequency as in waves per second so I'm not sure you have to?

Quick Reply

Latest