Edexcel IAL Chemistry Unit 1 (WCH01 )/ May 27 June 2016

Isotopes can still have different number of electrons, can't they?

Forget commas.
I've seen better sentence structure from a 5 year old.

okay guys for the question why aluminum has higher 4th and 3rd ionisation energy than first and second
i said in first and secoond electrons are removed from orbital i cant really remeber its name good loolz
and this is far from nucleus and its not full however in 3rd and 4th electrons are removed from innershielding electrons 2p orbital which are close to the nucleus and are full and stable

I wrote due to different shells like last two were 3p and and 3s while 3rd nd 4rth were from 3s and 2p the shells are different like 2,3 while 1st and second frm same shell

bro i wrote like this idk i mentioned 2p orbital and 3s orbital and that 3p is full and inner shell

I wrote due to different shells like last two were 3p and and 3s while 3rd nd 4rth were from 3s and 2p the shells are different like 2,3 while 1st and second frm same shell

I cant find this in neither the syllabus nor the past papers, how did you know that ??

sorry I know that was rude..

same. i didnt see that before and i even read the spec

guys there is no need to get scared. The space was actually for the students who wanted to write
M+ (g) - e ------> M2+ (g)
that's it

They asked for the first ionization energy. Sample atoms are bomarderd with electrons first to form positively charged ions.

Such that :

M + e- -----> M+ + 2e-
(g) (g)

They asked for the first ionization energy. Sample atoms are bomarderd with electrons first to form positively charged ions.

Such that :

M + e- -----> M+ + 2e-
(g) (g)

um i think they asked for second ionization energy

If I remember right I think they asked for the first ionization energy mate.

They actually asked for the "simplest" ionisation energy. Apparently, none of us ever heard about this before.

Oh yes that's right. Now I remember We haven't done that either. But before the exam I was going through some textbooks and they gave the equation for the first/ simplest ionization energy

They actually asked for the "simplest" ionisation energy. Apparently, none of us ever heard about this before.

um i think they asked for second ionization energy

No problem mate, just be a bit less aggressive next time. I Wish you the best of luck with the upcoming exams.