Right let me iron this out, guys, so when I would previously refer to reductionism I have to changed it with limited? e.g. a point
For the explanation of restrained eating as a failure to dieting
This explanation is limited in its view. This is due to the fact that failures of dieting is simply down to attempting to restrain yourselfs. This cannot account for everything because then it dosent explain how people with anorexia manage to eat nothing and not overeate at all. This means the view cant be generalised to a lot of different types of people hence making it limited in its view.
Would that be how you'd write it?