The Student Room Group

Edexcel AS/A2 Mathematics M1 - 8th June 2016 - Official Thread

Scroll to see replies

Original post by GarlicBread01
When can you assume that the reaction forces at two supports are the same? Is it only when the questions tell you they are, otherwise always assume they are not the same magnitude?

Yes exactly! Or the reaction forces are equidistant from the centre of mass of the rod and the weight of the rod is the only force acting downwards.
Original post by KloppOClock
only 6 marks?

Well for the tension... [please elaborate]
Original post by KloppOClock
here


Minor update to certain wording of the questions but otherwise the same stuff!
Original post by KloppOClock
if its is an isoceles triangle, and sinA=3/4, then drawing a triangle gives cosA as 3/4 as well i think?

cosa^2+sina^2 = 1.125 but i thought that was supposed to be equal to one


sin(a)=34\sin(a)=\frac{3}{4} and cos2(a)=1sin2(a)=716\cos^{2}(a)=1-\sin^{2}(a)=\frac{7}{16} so cos(a)=74\cos(a)=\frac{\sqrt{7}}{4}
Original post by Cryptokyo
sin(a)=34\sin(a)=\frac{3}{4} and cos2(a)=1sin2(a)=716\cos^{2}(a)=1-\sin^{2}(a)=\frac{7}{16} so cos(a)=74\cos(a)=\frac{\sqrt{7}}{4}


yh i forgot that was just for right angle triangles
Original post by KloppOClock
yh i forgot that was just for right angle triangles

Well you can split into two right angled triangles.
Diagram.png
Original post by Cryptokyo
My favourite M1 problem ever!!! And home made of course.
Q8.png


Do yoy have the answer for a? Not sure ive done it right
Original post by metrize
Do yoy have the answer for a? Not sure ive done it right


yeah same, i got (18-3root7)/4 :K:
[QUOTE="metrize;65449145"]Do yoy have the answer for a? Not sure ive done it right[/QUOTE

Answer in spoiler
Please say if anything wrong.

Spoiler

(edited 7 years ago)
[QUOTE="Cryptokyo;65450051"]
Original post by metrize
Do yoy have the answer for a? Not sure ive done it right[/QUOTE

Answer in spoiler
Please say if anything wrong.

Spoiler


Ah i messed up because for the 1kg particle i didnt realise it would have moved up the plane
[QUOTE="Cryptokyo;65450051"]
Original post by metrize
Do yoy have the answer for a? Not sure ive done it right[/QUOTE

Answer in spoiler
Please say if anything wrong.

Spoiler



oh i thought that as it says the rod remains in equilbrium, then the blocks remained in equilbrium, which isnt true
[QUOTE="KloppOClock;65450303"]
Original post by Cryptokyo


oh i thought that as it says the rod remains in equilbrium, then the blocks remained in equilbrium, which isnt true


The force that the tension exerts on the pulley keeps the rod in equilibrium as it produces a moment.
(edited 7 years ago)
[QUOTE="Cryptokyo;65450607"]
Original post by KloppOClock


The force that the tension exerts on the pulley keeps the rod in equilibrium as it produces a moment.


so the resultant force of the tension acting on the rod is equal to the weight of the particle on the rod?
Yes
Original post by KloppOClock


so the resultant force of the tension acting on the rod is equal to the weight of the particle on the rod?
Can someone help me urgently please? <3

LOOK IN DIAGRAM!


So in this question where it says 2.5 -x

I labelled that part as x and the other part where it says x as 2.5 - x, so essentially I switched them around

I did the calculation and got x = 2 MY WAY, but the mark scheme way (not switched around) got x = 0.5

Am I not aloud to label the end part as 2.5 - x or something?
Original post by KINGYusuf
Can someone help me urgently please? <3

LOOK IN DIAGRAM!


So in this question where it says 2.5 -x

I labelled that part as x and the other part where it says x as 2.5 - x, so essentially I switched them around

I did the calculation and got x = 2 MY WAY, but the mark scheme way (not switched around) got x = 0.5

Am I not aloud to label the end part as 2.5 - x or something?


No yours is right, you just have to mention that it is 2 metres from M to B or something like that.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by SaphBruh
No yours is right, you just have to mention that it is 2 metres from M to B or something like that.

Posted from TSR Mobile


Thanks, I was so stressed
Tomorrow I'm going to do 2 papers and review everything I'm unsure about in M1


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 358
image.jpgIn June 2014 r , why is it in part B the S is doubled
Original post by ArafH
image.jpgIn June 2014 r , why is it in part B the S is doubled


that question is impossible to read, can you not take a screenshot?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending