That exam was alright really, considering!
My answers (from what I remember):
Participation and democracy:
A) - one feature of a parliamentary democracy = parliament is sovereign and has the highest level of power. I gave an example when this has been highlighted.
- a second feature is that government is drawn from parliament, and therefore each member of government also sits in either the commons or lords also. Gave the example of George obsourne.
B) - one reason why voting should be compulsory is to increase levels of turnout, gave example of 2015 GE turnout and said that compulsory voting would help improve this.
- another reason is because it would increase the legitimacy of the government as higher voting levels would lead to a stronger mandate (gave example of Australia where levels never go below 90%)
- a third reason is to improve the amount of informed voters. Said that the compulsory vote would be likely to encourage people to get involved in becoming educated, for example reading party manifestos. Will lead to an overall more informed decision made when voting.
C) - intro
- said about membership of EU improving democracy because it led to the eventual incorporation of ECHR into British law in the form of the HRA in 1998. Better aided people in defending their rights. However, people criticise this because of the lack of entrenchment and so argue that the Act can be repealed or amended if we were to leave the EU.
- said that EU membership could harm democracy because upon joining we accept that certain EU laws are considered higher than UK law. Gave example of the Factortame Case were this became evident. However, some counter this point saying that the power that has been delegated can be easily restored to parliament if we were to leave the EU.
- devolution has enhanced representative democracy because it opened up new access points to pressure groups (gave example of single use carrier bags charge) and then said this shows that smaller groups with perhaps less resources can have a better chance at influencing legislation. However, some would argue that those groups that already have significant wealth and resources can have an unfair advantage over those who rely on access points and therefore may drown them out.
- concluded the points and added to the part about entrenchment of human rights that the liberal democrats support a codified constitution.
PRESSURE GROUPS:
A) one function of a pressure group is to raise profile/publicity for their cause (gave example of greenpeace and destroying GM crops)
Another function is to influence the implementation of legislation. Gave example of BMA influencing the NHS Reforms Bill in 2011-12 in order to secure conditions of a Public Health Service.
B) - one reason why PGs may result to illegal action is to raise profile for their issue. Gave example of greenpeace, said that it will gain publicity and media coverage which can pressure government.
- another reason is outsider status potentially due to lack of resources and the feeling that they can only make an impact with illegal action. Gave example of Fathers For Justice in 2004
- another reason is because their views conflict significantly with the governments. Gave example of Iraq war march in 2003 due to a Labour gov that supported military intervention and then the recent anti-austerity protests that turned violent in opposition to a conservative government.
C) - intro talking about how post WWII = butskellite consensus over state intervention = more interest in politics = arguably led to creation of many pressure groups and interest for participation in later years. But others argue that power and influence is in decline.
- in decline: declining size of TUs. Gave statistics from 1970s compared to 2015. Said that some argue that trade unions therefore have less influence now than they used to.
- not in decline: devolution = more access points (example: single use carrier bags charge passed as a result of effective lobbying). Therefore this shows that PGs still have significant influence over legislation.
- in decline: levels of participation in decline (example of 2015 GE turnout level). Shows that there's a decline in interest that may have been present in the Butskellite era but is now long gone.
- not in decline: only a decrease in FORMAL participation as PGs are fresh, attractive and current. For example, Fathers For Justice views may have been ignored in the past due to being drowned out by radical feminist movements but have now gained representation under a pressure group. Therefore,bid parties are becoming less attractive then this gives PGs more opportunities to further their cause(s).
in decline: 'gagging law' passed during 2010 coalition gov. Restricted spending powers of groups during N elections by up to 60%. Said that this disadvantages groups who rely on gov funding be will of many out of action or will have reduced their influence
not in decline: many groups still exist with a large following and influence who do not rely on gov funding. Gave example of green peace and highlighted a success they had in 2010 preventing a third runway at heathrow.
- conclusion