The Student Room Group

AQA AS Politics GovP2 09/06/16 Official Thread

Scroll to see replies

Original post by _polticsstudent
What are the impacts of the human rights act and the European court of human rights upon the British political system?


more judicial review and courts are involved more so therefore have more power.

Rights have been protected and the culture has changed. Appeall culture has developed e.g Murderers getting hard core porn through freedom of expression.
Original post by govandpolitics
more judicial review and courts are involved more so therefore have more power.

Rights have been protected and the culture has changed. Appeall culture has developed e.g Murderers getting hard core porn through freedom of expression.


What
Original post by govandpolitics
what are the constraints on parliamentary soverignty


All i can think of is the EU? e.g factortame
Original post by BirdIsWord
What


lol, its in the textbook
What are the constitutional influences and the limits to the powers of the government?
Original post by _polticsstudent
What are the constitutional influences and the limits to the powers of the government?


referendums, EU, Regular elections

Im not really sure tbh
Original post by _polticsstudent
What are the constitutional influences and the limits to the powers of the government?


Constitutional influences on what?
Original post by BirdIsWord
Constitutional influences on what?


That's what I'm unsure of, because it doesn't specify in the specification. It just says explain how far it influences the constitution
Original post by _polticsstudent
That's what I'm unsure of, because it doesn't specify in the specification. It just says explain how far it influences the constitution

But what is 'it'???
Reply 29
Original post by govandpolitics
yeah same, the ms doesn't help at all:angry:
I am sure you could discuss how the parliament can represent people by the use of standing, maybe select committee. The House of Lords could also be one.
Original post by saphh
I am sure you could discuss how the parliament can represent people by the use of standing, maybe select committee. The House of Lords could also be one.


No.. That's scrutiny not representation
Reply 31
Original post by BirdIsWord
No.. That's scrutiny, not representation
it can be both as one could use scrutiny to represent people.
Original post by saphh
it can be both as one could use scrutiny to represent people.


How? xD
Original post by BirdIsWord
I hope the 25 marker on the constitution is on the constitution and NOT the judiciary. For against codified or evaluating reforms.

For parliament something like how well it performs its functions.


Woooah now, what did you mean by evaluating reforms? Can you give an example I'm panicking!
Original post by BirdIsWord
How? xD
How effective is parliament in carrying out its representative role? (25marks)
Intro –Outline Burkean/resemblance theory as criteria They are effective at carrying out role-

Class
Theres a party to rep. every class
e.g. 2010 AB VOTERS more likely to vote Cons than Lab - 45%Cons 26% Lab
e.g. 2015 AB VOTERS 37%Cons 28%Lab

Growth in Nationalist Parties e.g. SNP 3rd largest party form 2015, therefore there is growing representation for underrepresented groups withing Parliament

Lobby/surgeryIncreasing use of surgeries - e.g. Lynne Featherstone MP for Woodgreen held regular constituency surgeires - ensures that MPs serve interests of their constituencies.

PMQ Bringing up concerns to Parliament An important function of PMQs is to bring constituency problems to the attention of the public, just as much as to the attention of the Prime Minister.
E.g. Jeremy Corbyns first PMQ - informed the House he’d received over 40,000 questions from voters and asked the first six, covering serious topics issues including housing and tax credits ending on mental health (2015)

They arent effective
Demography and lack of resemblance theory/ HOC Middle-Class
E.g. 26% of MPs = women. Hardly representative of wider population.
E.g. 4% Ethnic Minority.
E.g. 32% from middle-class or business background
sE.g. 10% of all Labour MPs from private schools

HOL Hereditry peers still exist regardless of reform - not representative of public. More men than womenMore Conservative leaning Lords (criticism of this is that reforms have made Tory/Labour balance more equal)

Whips Restricted by whips - party loyalty is first. E.g. wish for political advancement may hold MPs back from properly representing their party.
E.g. Burkean model - MPs are trustees NOT delegates
E.G. 2016 Academies bill required Conservative MPs to toe the party line despite constituency disagreement.

Select committees sometimes get evidence from constituencies to bring into debates, thats how theyre representative :smile:
(edited 7 years ago)
Hi, how many points is advised to include for both sides in the 25 markers
Original post by LenniesRabbit
Woooah now, what did you mean by evaluating reforms? Can you give an example I'm panicking!


Reforms are just things like devolution, HRA, CRA(2005), HoC and HoL reforms
I'm doing Multi level governance, Core Executive and the Constitution. Anyone got any Question predictions?
Original post by patrickwalters.x
Hi, how many points is advised to include for both sides in the 25 markers


It depends on the question/timing, but usually, 2 or 3 points on each side is good!
Reply 39
Core Executive 25 marker, possibly 'Is cabinet government an institution in decline?'

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending