I wouldnt mind the reasons for the depression either tbh - how much own knowledge are we supposed to put? Bc i feel like it's mostly source based and cross ref and own knowledge can become very limited
focus on sources but just smack loads of OK in there as well to be safe (remember its 24 marks for sources and 16 for OK)
yeah i guess so my school uses slightly different terms but it seems to be the same thing tbh. Have you just revised Hoover and not FDR?
For section B, only revised the causes for the depression & Hoover - not touched FDR so we only did the first controversy bc both of them are coming up anyways so its better to be very strong on one then be 50/50 with both haha
For section B, only revised the causes for the depression & Hoover - not touched FDR so we only did the first controversy bc both of them are coming up anyways so its better to be very strong on one then be 50/50 with both haha
I've done exactly the same- wanted to build up my confidence with Hoover but my school taught us both so we had the choice. Most people in my year have chosen to revise FDR exclusively and some people even said they would try and revise both. IMO its better to be confident on one than be half confident with two- plus deciding between them tomorrow would take up valuable time in the exam (every second counts)
I've done exactly the same- wanted to build up my confidence with Hoover but my school taught us both so we had the choice. Most people in my year have chosen to revise FDR exclusively and some people even said they would try and revise both. IMO its better to be confident on one than be half confident with two- plus deciding between them tomorrow would take up valuable time in the exam (every second counts)
Exactly my point! God how i hope they dont ask as a nasty question tomorrow, worded horribly
Exactly my point! God how i hope they dont ask as a nasty question tomorrow, worded horribly
yeah but just try and remember you know all the stuff and you know how to approach the question so just don't panic. Also i feel like there's less variety in the Hoover question, usually just a variation of 1 or 2 questions with different factors whereas FDR could be anything
yeah but just try and remember you know all the stuff and you know how to approach the question so just don't panic. Also i feel like there's less variety in the Hoover question, usually just a variation of 1 or 2 questions with different factors whereas FDR could be anything
With Hoover literally ALL they can ask is if his policies or his actions were enough or damaging, and as all already know, it was very limited and contradicting they cant ask anything else lol only thing i'm hoping with Hoover is i remember all the relevant OK i need
With Hoover literally ALL they can ask is if his policies or his actions were enough or damaging, and as all already know, it was very limited and contradicting they cant ask anything else lol only thing i'm hoping with Hoover is i remember all the relevant OK i need
yeah same i always find I panic thinking 'aaaahhh i don't know it' but once i get in there and see the sources I'm like 'ooooh yea i can write about that' just hoping the sources are rlly nice