The Student Room Group

The UK needs to STOP growing! (Out the EU I say)

Scroll to see replies

Reply 100
Original post by 999tigger
Its going to take a lot more than sweets and chcolate to pay for the NHS.


The NHS will be better off with my plan, less obese people less obesity related issues Diabetes, heart disease. this will save NHS a lot of money therefore putting more money back for government use which some could go to the elderly.

We could also make sure that the future elderly only retire when they reach a certain amount of money in there pension fund or when they reach 70 or become too ill to work. This will reduce the issues the elderly face.
u know I'm lucky cause I won't even be voting....too young:smile:
Leave the discussion to the adults
Reply 102
These funny threads are a relief from all the serious Brexit threads elsewhere
Yes!
YES!

We need Lebensraum!
Reply 104
Original post by 2016_GCSE
If we lose another 1/3 of arable land the world won't be producing enough food for everyone.

Well, yes it probably will. Over the past centuries, we've increase agricultural yields beyond all recognition. We will continue to do so, particularly given advancements in genetic modification. Indeed, we will also be able to grow crops in otherwise inhospitable places - and of course, as societies elsewhere develop, they also reap for straightforward benefits like proper irrigation.

Because of this advancement - "intensive farming" if you like - we are actually freeing up huge quantities of land already. It simply uses enormously less land - and so we are voluntarily withdrawing from it - it doesn't require climate change for that to happen. Meanwhile, each year we see new record yields globally.

Even putting aside technological advancement, agricultural efficiency is nothing like it could be because many of the countries involved are developing. Look at Zimbabwe: it's farms have been pretty much scuppered because of political decisions, not anything to do with what they actually can produce.

We are not self-sufficient - and even if we were, the idea of self-sufficiency would be disastrous. It would increase food prices exponentially, it would reduce choice and quality of produce. Just like in every other part of the economy, self-sufficiency has huge costs and precious few advantages in a globalised world.
Reply 105
I support a temp stop to immigration
Original post by 2016_GCSE


We could go more nuclear but a meltdown is not so good for the UK. Tidal could be a good option considering we are an island nation so this makes sense.


Oh right - so we mine uranium now do we? As for tidal - assuming we are trying to save the environment rather than destroy it, I don't think we have enough estuaries to keep the lights on.

There is an interesting book by a chap called Josh Harness. It is called Nobody Knows How to Make a Pencil and is about just that. The world has become more specialised to the point that there is no one single person on the planet who possesses all the skills and knowledge required to create something as simple as a pencil. The idea of self sufficiency is fine, but it just is not feasible any more.

To take your idea a little further - where are we going to buy all our farm machinery, or greenhouses from? We don't manufacture is all. And even if we did, many of the components required come from afar.
Reply 107
Original post by L i b
Well, yes it probably will. Over the past centuries, we've increase agricultural yields beyond all recognition. We will continue to do so, particularly given advancements in genetic modification. Indeed, we will also be able to grow crops in otherwise inhospitable places - and of course, as societies elsewhere develop, they also reap for straightforward benefits like proper irrigation.

Because of this advancement - "intensive farming" if you like - we are actually freeing up huge quantities of land already. It simply uses enormously less land - and so we are voluntarily withdrawing from it - it doesn't require climate change for that to happen. Meanwhile, each year we see new record yields globally.

Even putting aside technological advancement, agricultural efficiency is nothing like it could be because many of the countries involved are developing. Look at Zimbabwe: it's farms have been pretty much scuppered because of political decisions, not anything to do with what they actually can produce.

We are not self-sufficient - and even if we were, the idea of self-sufficiency would be disastrous. It would increase food prices exponentially, it would reduce choice and quality of produce. Just like in every other part of the economy, self-sufficiency has huge costs and precious few advantages in a globalised world.


Using land to produce food is an old technology, we can grow food in cities in buildings with soil that have advantages such as fewer miles to transport the food to consumers and freeing up land for other uses as well as less pollution.

http://www.cityfarmer.info/2015/07/17/philips-unveils-pioneering-new-city-farm-project-in-the-netherlands/
Reply 108
Tell me the premise to this thread is a joke.....
Reply 109
Original post by Maker
Using land to produce food is an old technology, we can grow food in cities in buildings with soil that have advantages such as fewer miles to transport the food to consumers and freeing up land for other uses as well as less pollution.

http://www.cityfarmer.info/2015/07/17/philips-unveils-pioneering-new-city-farm-project-in-the-netherlands/


People can do this but we need the building's to put the plant's in and building out cities larger is going to add more pollution in cities through more vehicles operating in the dense areas rather than spread out between the country.

It could back fire.
Reply 110
Original post by ByEeek
Oh right - so we mine uranium now do we? As for tidal - assuming we are trying to save the environment rather than destroy it, I don't think we have enough estuaries to keep the lights on.

There is an interesting book by a chap called Josh Harness. It is called Nobody Knows How to Make a Pencil and is about just that. The world has become more specialised to the point that there is no one single person on the planet who possesses all the skills and knowledge required to create something as simple as a pencil. The idea of self sufficiency is fine, but it just is not feasible any more.

To take your idea a little further - where are we going to buy all our farm machinery, or greenhouses from? We don't manufacture is all. And even if we did, many of the components required come from afar.


I would prefer to see tidal, this site show's hydro is giving France 1/5 of it's electricity.

http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/france/

The UK could work on hydro / tidal to develop a green production of energy. I certainly think we have more suitable places to put them than France does.
Original post by ByEeek
We haven't been self sufficient for the last 100 years or so. Why now?


Great argument, more of the **** situation we know please, instead of a chance to aim higher and be free.
Original post by SaucissonSecCy
Great argument, more of the **** situation we know please, instead of a chance to aim higher and be free.


But free of what? Have you actually thought about what being self sufficient means as a country? It means we only have our dwindling supplies of gas and oil to count on so we would have to seriously cut back on energy consumption. We would no longer enjoy exotic fruits like bananas and melons or green beans outside of July or August. The lack of land in this country to support the population would mean we could not afford fripperies like greenhouses and poly-tunnels growing strawberries and tomatoes. And then there is electronic goods - we don't really make any of that so you can say goodbye to your iPhone and your Android. In fact just about every piece of white goods or electronics. And absolutely no foreign holidays again right? Why would you want to sun yourself in the Caribbean when you have Bridlington on a rainy summers day?

When you talk about aiming higher and being free, you are basically sending us back to tudor times. How is being free better?
Original post by 2016_GCSE
I would prefer to see tidal, this site show's hydro is giving France 1/5 of it's electricity.

http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/france/


Great site. But you are getting confused between tidal, which is the tidal barrage at Rance contributing about 0.15% of total power, but not at slack water, and hydro power generated by letting water fall from a holding lake at high altitude through a pipe and generator. France has this small mountain range called the Alps to build these. We are less fortunate although we do have a couple in Wales that are used to power TV advert breaks when the country switches on the kettle.
Reply 114
Original post by ByEeek
Great site. But you are getting confused between tidal, which is the tidal barrage at Rance contributing about 0.15% of total power, but not at slack water, and hydro power generated by letting water fall from a holding lake at high altitude through a pipe and generator. France has this small mountain range called the Alps to build these. We are less fortunate although we do have a couple in Wales that are used to power TV advert breaks when the country switches on the kettle.


Well i'm sure the UK has some more suitable sites for both these or could we man make suitable landscapes? The UK could also focus on wind as i'm sure you understand the UK is a country with a lot of wind and a bit of solar could help power during some times or if we really need to we can have some coal plants on standby. Nuclear could be very hazardous if we have any risk of meltdown in a country like the UK.
Original post by 2016_GCSE
Well i'm sure the UK has some more suitable sites for both these or could we man make suitable landscapes? The UK could also focus on wind as i'm sure you understand the UK is a country with a lot of wind and a bit of solar could help power during some times or if we really need to we can have some coal plants on standby. Nuclear could be very hazardous if we have any risk of meltdown in a country like the UK.


I wish my world was as idealistic as yours. If we go down the wind route, what happens on weeks like last week where there was no wind on the North Wales coastline and then windmills there weren't turning? And if you are going to build solar power, where are you going to put your crops? Remember - we don't have enough land at present to sustain us. As for tidal power - you can count the number of estuaries in the UK. Even if you optimistically predict that each can generate 2% of power requirements, there aren't enough. As for your idea of shaping the landscape - you can't even get planning permission for a modest house - how are you going to get consent for a new estuary? And where is the fuel coming from to create it?
Reply 116
Original post by ByEeek
I wish my world was as idealistic as yours. If we go down the wind route, what happens on weeks like last week where there was no wind on the North Wales coastline and then windmills there weren't turning? And if you are going to build solar power, where are you going to put your crops? Remember - we don't have enough land at present to sustain us. As for tidal power - you can count the number of estuaries in the UK. Even if you optimistically predict that each can generate 2% of power requirements, there aren't enough. As for your idea of shaping the landscape - you can't even get planning permission for a modest house - how are you going to get consent for a new estuary? And where is the fuel coming from to create it?


We put Solar panels on roofs. We put wind turbines on moor land or offshore.

If a government can just about get permission for a long rail line to strip through England something that could contribute to green energy is certain to get permission if it is worth while to produce a good amount of electricity.

The fuel will be shipped in from oil producing countries to power machinery or we could research electrical or hybrid construction equipment to complete these projects.
Original post by 2016_GCSE

The fuel will be shipped in from oil producing countries to power machinery or we could research electrical or hybrid construction equipment to complete these projects.


So it is ok to import oil, but not food? Weird!
Reply 118
Original post by ByEeek
I wish my world was as idealistic as yours. If we go down the wind route, what happens on weeks like last week where there was no wind on the North Wales coastline and then windmills there weren't turning? And if you are going to build solar power, where are you going to put your crops? Remember - we don't have enough land at present to sustain us. As for tidal power - you can count the number of estuaries in the UK. Even if you optimistically predict that each can generate 2% of power requirements, there aren't enough. As for your idea of shaping the landscape - you can't even get planning permission for a modest house - how are you going to get consent for a new estuary? And where is the fuel coming from to create it?


I think he's operating under the assumption that hydro-electric technology allows you to generate significant amounts of power by putting turbines anywhere in the sea at random, rather than somewhere which would actually have a lot of flowing water.
Reply 119
Original post by ByEeek
So it is ok to import oil, but not food? Weird!


food is something that we need to survive 100% of a need, which is why we need 100% control of it.

The oil will only be used if necessary because where do you see machinery on construction sites today that uses 100% electricity?

Oil still has time left, oil can be discovered monthly pushing the lifespan of oil.

After 20 years we should have electrical equipment on construction sites replacing oil fuelled machinery.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending