"Death to Traitors, Freedom for Britain".

Because he felt that maybe as a white women she was betraying the country because of her stance on foreign affairs involving the Middle East? he is a neonazi and racist so he it wouldn't surprise me

The same local people who identified him as a polite and quiet gardener?

I dont know that, i would suggest some radicilisation centres heavily around that idea and the perceived injustice.... Is there a point you are making here or are you looking to make a good argument for why its bad to take in 2 million war torn refugees who can easily be aggrieved by their new host countries role?

The point im making is perfectly legitimate, you are clearly too stupid to even realise its just a counter argument for the comment you made.

Cant expect intelligence from the far right wing.

Oh your last line, no i would never stoop so low as to blaming every refugee for the actions of a few, if that was the case i would be blaming every white person in the country for the actions of Tommy Mair...

Its also funny how the comment section of said far right newspapers is EMPTY after this attack, there were about 3000 comments after Orlando. Funny is it not?

You cant even EXPLAIN the point you are making, how on earth can you be so sure its legitimate lmfao. A COUNTER ARGUMENT HOW??? OMG

Don't generalise racists - only 0.001% of racists are terrorists

The majority of people in the world admit to having racial prejudices - if racism was so bad, we'd all be dead by now

Its because of this alienation that they resort to these attacks

Or maybe start up the mental asylums again, to house these (and other) nutters?

I think we can certainly say now this killing was political . To @tanyapotter how do you know this man was a white supremacist? Because he killed a white woman whilst letting her Muslim brown female assistant live???

How do you know he did not kill Mrs Cox because he was aggrieved by cuts to his mental health service and felt mrs Cox work for Syria refugees was at the expense of his own plight? <(Its not a rhetorical question btw)

I suppose we could also make people think that Britain is a bad country, and teach them how awful the British Empire was, how evil Christianity and Atheism are, how evil the white male patriarchy was, and in fact raise all Brits as Muslims

You don't recognise any of them?

Lets go through it step by step;

You said and i quote "he was aggrieved by cuts to his mental health service and felt mrs Cox work for Syria refugees was at the expense of his own plight?"

I stated that why dont you use the same argument when a refugee or someone from Syria or other war torn countries commits an attack, are they not aggrieved by others actions?

I dont think a lot of people understand the frustration, of seeing this terrorist being labelled as "mentally ill with no previous record" i dont care if he was mentally ill infact numerous reports suggest he only had OCD. If you use mental health as an excuse for one terrorist why is this not used for another of a different color?

Also i think you know as well as i do, had this attack been carried out by a Brown or Black individual then the reaction would have been SO much different, in fact this country would have been a volatile place had that been the case. But it seems quite a few people are making excuses for this, excuses they would never have made if the attacker was a different shade of beige.

Firstly... you have deliberately and selectively quoted me to make it look like a statement instead of what it was which was a question. Here it is below:

I did not say that feeling aggrieved at mental health services being cut means he was justified... I said it to a person who portrayed his grievances as being due to white supremacy.

We dont know the extent of his mental health, if he had OCD and thats it, it clearly has zero bearing on this crime. No, we do also treat brown and black people the same.. do you remember a brown muslim beheading a frail 82 year old grandmother in London whilst shouting allah ackbar? ... He was not convicted of terrorism, it was not an act of terror. He was mentally ill. You have deep entrenched biases... thats why you ignore it. READ

He most definitely did not murder Jo Cox because he was annoyed about mental health cuts. I am annoyed about mental health cuts. I don't kill people because of it.

Don't generalise racists - only 0.001% of racists are terrorists

The majority of people in the world admit to having racial prejudices - if racism was so bad, we'd all be dead by now

Its because of this alienation that they resort to these attacks

Do you not recognise the arguments?

#NotAllMuslims
#RightToReligion
#HomophobiaAndSexismIsNotOnlyNaturalItIsAllah'sWill

One radical solution would be to stop the teaching of the Nazis, and purge every mention of them from historical records

Yes, we wouldn't have the benefit of 'learning from the past', but there will always be a minority of people who like the idea of the Nazis, and are inspired by the Holocaust - and these are the people we are worried about; we would stop giving them ideas this way, and they'd likely end up committing petty crimes instead of terrorism

Do you not recognise the arguments?

#NotAllMuslims
#RightToReligion
#HomophobiaAndSexismIsNotOnlyNaturalItIsAllah'sWill

If we just wiped out every mention of race in every single textbook, who would even think about being racist? Nobody is eye-colour-ist, its not natural, so why would people be racist unless they got the idea somewhere? If we made the whole concept of racism completely alien to people, nobody would be racist.

If we just wiped out every mention of race in every single textbook, who would even think about being racist? Nobody is eye-colour-ist, its not natural, so why would people be racist unless they got the idea somewhere? If we made the whole concept of racism completely alien to people, nobody would be racist.