The Student Room Group

Edexcel D1 - 17th June, 2016 [Exam discussion]

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Pablo Picasso
For the flow chart, was it 135 as the ouput, something like 80+55?


output t = 135

algorithm multiplies x + y together
Original post by James10090
Does anyone know the breakdown for the linear programme question?


(a) 2 marks (for the cost inequality)
(b) 4 marks (for the graph)
(c) 1 mark (for the objective function)
(d) 3 marks (for the objective line and optimal vertex's location)
(e) 2 marks (for finding the exact co-ordinates of V)
(f) 3 marks (for finding integer solutions and the corresponding cost)

Total: 14 marks.

I hope that this helps!

(By the way, I don't even know how I managed to remember that!)

(Wait, that can't possibly be right: that comes to 15 marks! Please excuse me whilst I go and time-travel back to yesterday's paper, and try to remember exactly where I went wrong just there...)
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by iMacJack
output t = 135

algorithm multiplies x + y together


What multiplies what to what?
Original post by Pablo Picasso
What multiplies what to what?


The algorithm's output was simply the product of x and y, so yes the output was 135
Original post by Pablo Picasso
What multiplies what to what?


Overall, it was x and y: as 27 X 5 = 135.

(The trace-table had you doing 80 + 55 - so, that was definitely right!)

You then had to use this multiplication in part (b)(ii): 122 X (1/2) = 61.
Original post by iMacJack
The algorithm's output was simply the product of x and y, so yes the output was 135


What was the value of x and y?
Original post by Pablo Picasso
What was the value of x and y?


x = 27, y = 5
Original post by mupsman2312
Overall, it was x and y: as 27 X 5 = 135.

(The trace-table had you doing 80 + 55 - so, that was definitely right!)

You then had to use this multiplication in part (b)(ii): 122 X (1/2) = 61.


Can remember get 135 from 80+55 = 135, but cant remember doing 27*5. I'm screwed
Original post by iMacJack
x = 27, y = 5


I can remember doing 80 + 55 and outputting 135 as the answer, would that mean i must have gotten x and y as 27 and 5? Vaguely remember what i wrote now
Original post by mupsman2312
(a) 2 marks (for the cost inequality)
(b) 4 marks (for the graph)
(c) 1 mark (for the objective function)
(d) 3 marks (for the objective line and optimal vertex's location)
(e) 2 marks (for finding the exact co-ordinates of V)
(f) 3 marks (for finding integer solutions and the corresponding cost)

Total: 14 marks.

I hope that this helps!

(By the way, I don't even know how I managed to remember that!)


That adds up to 15 mate, i think (a) was 1 mark
Do curved arcs matter when drawing the activity network in question 2?
Original post by iMacJack
The algorithm's output was simply the product of x and y, so yes the output was 135


Do you know how many marks that was worth?
Original post by Jporter1399
Do you know how many marks that was worth?


I think the first part might have been 5 and then the second part 3

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by James10090
Does anyone know the breakdown for the linear programme question? Or just the marks breakdown in general. Would be helpful for everyone


I was something like this (I'm pretty sure, at least!):


Matchings:
(a) 2 marks (definition of a bipartite graph);
(b) 3 marks (alternating path).
{Total: 5 marks}

Activity network:
5 marks (drawing only).
{Total: 5 marks}

List of numbers:
(a) 4 marks (quick sort);
(b) 3 marks (bin-packing);
(c) 2 marks ("Is this solution optimal?").
{Total: 9 marks}

Flow Chart:
(a) 4 marks (trace-table);
(b) 3 marks - (i): choice and explanation (presumably 2 marks);
(ii): new output (presumably 1 mark);
{Total: 7 marks}

Shortest route:
(a) 6 marks (Dijkstra's algorithm);
(b) 2 marks (A to F, via J);
(c) 3 marks (Prim's algorithm);
(d) 1 mark (weight of MST).
{Total: 12 marks}

Route inspection:
(a) 5 marks (repetition and length);
(b) 2 marks (explanation: starting at a vertex with an odd degree);
(c) 2 marks (determining the finish point);
(d) 2 marks (route and new length).
{Total: 11 marks}

Critical path analysis:
(a) 3 marks (finding the values of w, x, y and z);
(b) 4 marks (cascade/Gantt chart);
(c) 2 marks (lower bound);
(d) 3 marks ([that really annoying] schedule!).
{Total: 12 marks}

Linear programming:
(a) 1-2 marks [I'm not quite sure...] (finding a cost inequality);
(b) 3-4 marks [the same thing again!] (plotting [and shading] the graph);
(c) 1 mark (stating the objective function);
(d) 3 marks (drawing an objective line, and locating the optimal vertex);
(e) 2 marks (calculating the exact co-ordinates of V);
(f) 3 marks (seeking for integer values, and then calculating the corresponding cost).
{Total: 14 marks}*

(*I know that that comes to 15 marks, but I can't quite remember exactly where I seemed to just add an extra one in... Was it only 1 mark for the cost inequality? 3 for the graph? It was something like that...)

{Grand total for paper: 75 marks} [Obviously!]


Wow - that took a pretty while to do! After all, that was all from memory! I sincerely hope that this can help!
Original post by frances98
I think the first part might have been 5 and then the second part 3

Posted from TSR Mobile


Unfortunately, they were really harsh - and only gave us 4 marks for completing such a long-winded trace-table!
Original post by Pablo Picasso
Can remember get 135 from 80+55 = 135, but cant remember doing 27*5. I'm screwed


Don't worry - you never did have to do 27 X 5; this was only what the algorithm achieved, overall. :tongue: This and that addition both gave 135. This is how I knew to then do 122 X (1/2) in part (b)(ii), in order to give 61.
Thanks a lot
Original post by mupsman2312
I was something like this (I'm pretty sure, at least!):


Matchings:
(a) 2 marks (definition of a bipartite graph);
(b) 3 marks (alternating path).
{Total: 5 marks}

Activity network:
5 marks (drawing only).
{Total: 5 marks}

List of numbers:
(a) 4 marks (quick sort);
(b) 3 marks (bin-packing);
(c) 2 marks ("Is this solution optimal?":wink:.
{Total: 9 marks}

Flow Chart:
(a) 4 marks (trace-table);
(b) 3 marks - (i): choice and explanation (presumably 2 marks);
(ii): new output (presumably 1 mark);
{Total: 7 marks}

Shortest route:
(a) 6 marks (Dijkstra's algorithm);
(b) 2 marks (A to F, via J);
(c) 3 marks (Prim's algorithm);
(d) 1 mark (weight of MST).
{Total: 12 marks}

Route inspection:
(a) 5 marks (repetition and length);
(b) 2 marks (explanation: starting at a vertex with an odd degree);
(c) 2 marks (determining the finish point);
(d) 2 marks (route and new length).
{Total: 11 marks}

Critical path analysis:
(a) 3 marks (finding the values of w, x, y and z);
(b) 4 marks (cascade/Gantt chart);
(c) 2 marks (lower bound);
(d) 3 marks ([that really annoying] schedule!).
{Total: 12 marks}

Linear programming:
(a) 1-2 marks [I'm not quite sure...] (finding a cost inequality);
(b) 3-4 marks [the same thing again!] (plotting [and shading] the graph);
(c) 1 mark (stating the objective function);
(d) 3 marks (drawing an objective line, and locating the optimal vertex);
(e) 2 marks (calculating the exact co-ordinates of V);
(f) 3 marks (seeking for integer values, and then calculating the corresponding cost).
{Total: 14 marks}*

(*I know that that comes to 15 marks, but I can't quite remember exactly where I seemed to just add an extra one in... Was it only 1 mark for the cost inequality? 3 for the graph? It was something like that...)

{Grand total for paper: 75 marks} [Obviously!]


Wow - that took a pretty while to do! After all, that was all from memory! I sincerely hope that this can help!


Original post by mupsman2312
I was something like this (I'm pretty sure, at least!):


Matchings:
(a) 2 marks (definition of a bipartite graph);
(b) 3 marks (alternating path).
{Total: 5 marks}

Activity network:
5 marks (drawing only).
{Total: 5 marks}

List of numbers:
(a) 4 marks (quick sort);
(b) 3 marks (bin-packing);
(c) 2 marks ("Is this solution optimal?":wink:.
{Total: 9 marks}

Flow Chart:
(a) 4 marks (trace-table);
(b) 3 marks - (i): choice and explanation (presumably 2 marks);
(ii): new output (presumably 1 mark);
{Total: 7 marks}

Shortest route:
(a) 6 marks (Dijkstra's algorithm);
(b) 2 marks (A to F, via J);
(c) 3 marks (Prim's algorithm);
(d) 1 mark (weight of MST).
{Total: 12 marks}

Route inspection:
(a) 5 marks (repetition and length);
(b) 2 marks (explanation: starting at a vertex with an odd degree);
(c) 2 marks (determining the finish point);
(d) 2 marks (route and new length).
{Total: 11 marks}

Critical path analysis:
(a) 3 marks (finding the values of w, x, y and z);
(b) 4 marks (cascade/Gantt chart);
(c) 2 marks (lower bound);
(d) 3 marks ([that really annoying] schedule!).
{Total: 12 marks}

Linear programming:
(a) 1-2 marks [I'm not quite sure...] (finding a cost inequality);
(b) 3-4 marks [the same thing again!] (plotting [and shading] the graph);
(c) 1 mark (stating the objective function);
(d) 3 marks (drawing an objective line, and locating the optimal vertex);
(e) 2 marks (calculating the exact co-ordinates of V);
(f) 3 marks (seeking for integer values, and then calculating the corresponding cost).
{Total: 14 marks}*

(*I know that that comes to 15 marks, but I can't quite remember exactly where I seemed to just add an extra one in... Was it only 1 mark for the cost inequality? 3 for the graph? It was something like that...)

{Grand total for paper: 75 marks} [Obviously!]


Wow - that took a pretty while to do! After all, that was all from memory! I sincerely hope that this can help!
image.jpeg
Original post by mupsman2312
Don't worry - you never did have to do 27 X 5; this was only what the algorithm achieved, overall. :tongue: This and that addition both gave 135. This is how I knew to then do 122 X (1/2) in part (b)(ii), in order to give 61.


So at the end 80+55 = 135 would get you the full marks provided u didnt make any mistakes?
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by Pablo Picasso
So at the end 80+55 = 135 would get you the full marks provided u didnt make any mistakes?


Yes, that algorithm was to find the product of the two values x and y! You didn't have to say that 27*5 was 135, because your t value 80 + 55 showed it anyway
what do you guys think the grade boundaries will be?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending