The Student Room Group

A2 OCR Economics F585 June 2016

Scroll to see replies

Reply 620
Need an extra week on economics -.-
Original post by Pato1
Need an extra week on economics -.-


i second that! got 13 hours to do it all, starting at midnight, hopefully everything goes in like
Original post by Faz The Poet
Also injection into economy can mean demand pull inflation i think


yeah thats true, and say that that depends on where the economy was to begin with and the size of the shift etc. as in f582
Reply 623
Original post by SilverHorsey
i second that! got 13 hours to do it all, starting at midnight, hopefully everything goes in like

I swear you said you were going to start at 8, procrastination at its finest haha
Original post by Loyle
I swear you said you were going to start at 8, procrastination at its finest haha


tell me about it, i lie actually, ive learnt the definition of globalisation so have done a wee bit haha 8)
guys, for this question, is my response okay?

Analyse 2 factors that have caused globalisation. (6 marks)

One cause of globalisation is the fall in real transport costs, occurred due to innovation and greater privatisation of transport across the world. The increased use of containerisation for example has led to lower average transport costs. This has meant that MNC’s can locate in low wage, low cost economies and export production to other countries in order to maximise profit. This opens up new markets and creates more global trade links.

A second cause of globalisation is reduced trade barriers. The World Trade Organisation has encouraged countries to reduce tariff barriers and other forms of protectionism, so that they can specialise according to their comparative advantage. This opens up markets to more competition. Consumers have more choice of products from around the world as increased trade between countries is encouraged. Regional Economic groups such as the EU, despite using protectionism against non-members, have encouraged free trade between members leading to more interdependence.
Reply 626
Refer to 2nd point as trade liberalisation
Why not Join the whatsapp Group chat for F585/F583/F584 for a much quicker response and for some amazing resources, simply whatsapp me on 07459131684.
Reply 628
Gl
Reply 629
Yes lads
what's the difference between sustainable growth and long run growth?
Original post by 24601jvj
what's the difference between sustainable growth and long run growth?


Sustainable growth is growth that does not prevent future generations from achieving growth, and long run growth is just an increase the the productive capacity of the economy (LRAS shifts out).
Prediction for 20 marker?
Reply 633
Anyone got th plan for remittances ? Thought the exam was at 9 so came into college without my notes Lol. Sort m out pls
Original post by SeaSquab
Sustainable growth is growth that does not prevent future generations from achieving growth, and long run growth is just an increase the the productive capacity of the economy (LRAS shifts out).


so long run growth would enable sustainable growth?
Reply 635
Original post by MrCoolVille
Prediction for 20 marker?


discuss whether reforms to the supply side are key to promoting long term economic growth
The calm before the storm....
Original post by Berke0
Anyone got th plan for remittances ? Thought the exam was at 9 so came into college without my notes Lol. Sort m out pls


It's quite an easy one so start with giving the definition then move onto the pros:

Remittances can serve to increase incomes for the recipients in developing countries and acts as a top-up to income. This can then be spent on improving their material living standards e.g. buying a car etc. and/or can be spent on improving their non-material living standards e.g. greater access to schooling and education

Secondly, remittances can foster the growth of entrepeneurship as inididuals receving income top-ups via remittances may choose to set-up domestic businesses or purchase capital machiner- thus improving their own standard of living and alleviating poverty. Further, they may then employ other locals thus creating a multiplier effect further improving development and growth. Lastly, it can improve the quality of local schools and hospitals because remittance receivers might partly or directly give money to schools and hospitals where their children or relatives attend - thus improving development since it could improve school enrolment rates etc.

On the other hand, leads to a brain drain effect with high skilled workers emigrating to more advanced economies (DRAW LRAS DIAGRAM SHIFTING TO THE LEFT) therefore reducing incomes and labour force.

Remittances is almost all but sent directly to the families which means the Govt. gets no fiscal dividend from them which reduces Govt. spending on infrastructure, schools, hospital etc.

Could lead to a moral hazard - locals choosing not to work due to remittance income

Individual sums not large enough to fund large scale development progress

Conclusion: It's significant but needs ODA and FDI to fill the gaps
Reply 638
Remittances is very sustainable (according to graph)
Reply 639
Original post by charlieoakley97
It's quite an easy one so start with giving the definition then move onto the pros:

Remittances can serve to increase incomes for the recipients in developing countries and acts as a top-up to income. This can then be spent on improving their material living standards e.g. buying a car etc. and/or can be spent on improving their non-material living standards e.g. greater access to schooling and education

Secondly, remittances can foster the growth of entrepeneurship as inididuals receving income top-ups via remittances may choose to set-up domestic businesses or purchase capital machiner- thus improving their own standard of living and alleviating poverty. Further, they may then employ other locals thus creating a multiplier effect further improving development and growth. Lastly, it can improve the quality of local schools and hospitals because remittance receivers might partly or directly give money to schools and hospitals where their children or relatives attend - thus improving development since it could improve school enrolment rates etc.

On the other hand, leads to a brain drain effect with high skilled workers emigrating to more advanced economies (DRAW LRAS DIAGRAM SHIFTING TO THE LEFT) therefore reducing incomes and labour force.

Remittances is almost all but sent directly to the families which means the Govt. gets no fiscal dividend from them which reduces Govt. spending on infrastructure, schools, hospital etc.

Could lead to a moral hazard - locals choosing not to work due to remittance income

Individual sums not large enough to fund large scale development progress

Conclusion: It's significant but needs ODA and FDI to fill the gaps


awesome thanks Charlie

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending