The Student Room Group

Official M5 Edexcel Thread June 2016

Scroll to see replies

Mad busy here. Everyone confident?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Krollo
Mad busy here. Everyone confident?


If this exam is not completely standard then I will be mildly annoyed.
Good luck guys. May the force exerted on the axis be with you.
If not take moments all will be good.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by physicsmaths
Good luck guys. May the force exerted on the axis be with you.
If not take moments all will be good.


Posted from TSR Mobile


Good luck m8!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by ombtom
If this exam is not completely standard then I will be mildly annoyed.


Only mildly? I'll be dying...

Original post by physicsmaths
Good luck guys. May the force exerted on the axis be with you.
If not take moments all will be good.


Posted from TSR Mobile


Word.

Good luck people :smile:

Posted from TSR Mobile
A cylindrical shell is a hollow cylinder with no caps on right?

I got 1/3 •M•h^2 but I got so confused

Posted from TSR Mobile
It is. I got Mr²/2 + Mh²/3 though.
Reply 147
Did people find that easier than last years?
Original post by Bolts
Did people find that easier than last years?


I think the rotational moments questions were easier, but I would think that the other questions were a bit harder than usual, grade boundaries will probably be roughly the same.
Original post by talentedlobster
It is. I got Mr²/2 + Mh²/3 though.


That's the one ¡
Original post by Euclidean
A cylindrical shell is a hollow cylinder with no caps on right?

I got 1/3 •M•h^2 but I got so confused

Posted from TSR Mobile


I just did it with ends aswell tbh. **** knows. Did both ways.
I definately dropped marks tbh. The simple pendulum i am pretty sure i got wrong ,i found stable equilibrium pint so where the COM was then did some next geoemtry moments


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Bolts
Did people find that easier than last years?


Na it was harder i predict 2 marks lower then last yrs boundaries.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 152
Original post by physicsmaths
I just did it with ends aswell tbh. **** knows. Did both ways.
I definately dropped marks tbh. The simple pendulum i am pretty sure i got wrong ,i found stable equilibrium pint so where the COM was then did some next geoemtry moments


Posted from TSR Mobile


For the COM did you have it a/2 from the bend to the right and a/2 up?
Original post by Bolts
For the COM did you have it a/2 from the bend to the right and a/2 up?


Yep.
I made a mistake in MI question did
MI about diameter of disc is 1/2mr^2 😂.
Lol cares, got my 85.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by physicsmaths
I just did it with ends aswell tbh. **** knows. Did both ways.
I definately dropped marks tbh. The simple pendulum i am pretty sure i got wrong ,i found stable equilibrium pint so where the COM was then did some next geoemtry moments


Posted from TSR Mobile


I think I f****d up. :facepalm:

Anyone have any numerical answers?

Q1: -6 i + 25/2 j

Q2: cos (t) i - 2sin (2t) j

Q3: (-3, 0, 1) but this was different to the resultant x the vector they give so I probably messed up

Q4: Really messed up

Q5: Assuming this is the variable mass

v = u•ln (5) - 19.6

Q6: a) omega = 3J/2mga I think
b) T = 20pi/3 root {g/5a}

Q7: b) Y = 7/8 mg
But I think I was supposed to take 3mg/8 away from mg/2 not add it... FFS

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Mathemagicien
I recognise these numbers


right so I probably got 4/7 right then 😂

Praying for more method marks than accuracy marks :redface:

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Mathemagicien
I did, although of course maybe I just made loads of mistakes :biggrin:



Hmm, I got Mr^2/4 + Mh^2/3

You did remember that M.I. of circle about its diameter is mr^2/4, not mr^2/2? I remember I initially made that mistake


It was hollow though so you need the MI of a circular arc about its diameter which is mr^2/2
Original post by Nikulp68
It was hollow though so you need the MI of a circular arc about its diameter which is mr^2/2


It was completely hollow? I don't think it was.
It was either both ends covered or none since hey said about 1 end implying that it is symmetric.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by physicsmaths
It was completely hollow? I don't think it was.
It was either both ends covered or none since hey said about 1 end implying that it is symmetric.


Posted from TSR Mobile


Shoot. My bad. How many marks would that be? Marks lost, that is.
Original post by Mathemagicien
Ah :tongue:

Oops :redface:


I did it like a rod. :lol: :facepalm:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending