On A i wrote not entry, on B no appropriation, on C criminal damage isnt part of 91b, and then on D I wrote that he WAS liable because he could only steal the bike because he had used force immediately before to scare Jill and she wouldnt of let him get away with ti if she wasnt scared still but now I think that was wrong. Hopefully the MS lets it go either way with some common sense.
I did the question where Sandra brutally beat the **** out of Tayla, like holy **** that was brutal, but I feel I did okay on that. But I got Beard and T messed up, I wrote that Beard is the case where unconsciousness was bodily harm but then after the exam I realised it was T. Do you think I will lose many marks for that mistake with the case names?
I ran out of time on Section A when I was doing the Theft actus reus question, I only wrote about 2.5 sides because I spent too long on B an C.
But I only need a C really in this exam and the other, because I got an A in AS and I need a B overall, so a C this years fine and I think I should of got that okay.