The Student Room Group

What are your red-flags for the opposite sex?

I think it's useful to have a series of red-flags, centered around pattern recognition, which help to identify dysfunctional members of the opposite sex who would make for bad partners.

For me, these are:

- She doesn't have a good relationship with her father.
- She is open about "hating children".
- She regularly uses drugs.
- She dyes her hair pastel/bright colors (blue/green/orange).
- She has tattoos.
- She has had sex with a reckless number of partners.
- She engages in serial monogamy.
- She dislikes and traduces her own racial group, while worshipping others (think wiggers and asiaphiles).

How about you?

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Anthony Ludovici
I think it's useful to have a series of red-flags, centered around pattern recognition, which help to identify dysfunctional members of the opposite sex who would make for bad partners.

For me, these are:

- She doesn't have a good relationship with her father.
- She is open about "hating children".
- She regularly uses drugs.
- She dyes her hair pastel/bright colors (blue/green/orange).
- She has tattoos.
- She has had sex with a reckless number of partners.
- She engages in serial monogamy.
- She dislikes and traduces her own racial group, while worshipping others (think wiggers and asiaphiles).

How about you?


What is the definition of a reckless number of partners?

And as for being a monogamous person, does it most of the time indicate she is relationship material?
Reply 2
- Sucks dick on request
- Criminal record
- Smokes
- Arrogance
- Is bitter over the most little of things
- Is influenced easily and can't decide on what he wants.
- When she's a Brexiter
Original post by MrsSheldonCooper
What is the definition of a reckless number of partners?


7+

And as for being a monogamous person, does it most of the time indicate she is relationship material?


Not if she's in a different relationship every single year.
Reply 6
"I'm pro-life".
Reply 7
Half those things would be a huge attraction for me. Long live diversity I guess.
Original post by Anthony Ludovici
I think it's useful to have a series of red-flags, centered around pattern recognition, which help to identify dysfunctional members of the opposite sex who would make for bad partners.

For me, these are:

- She doesn't have a good relationship with her father.
- She is open about "hating children".
- She regularly uses drugs.
- She dyes her hair pastel/bright colors (blue/green/orange).
- She has tattoos.
- She has had sex with a reckless number of partners.
- She engages in serial monogamy.
- She dislikes and traduces her own racial group, while worshipping others (think wiggers and asiaphiles).

How about you?


Note that almost none of these things are indicative of how good or bad a person is, or how good or bad a partner they would make. There are a number of people who's fathers are horrible. Some people don't want to have children or have bad experiences with them. Hair color is irrelevant. Tattoos are irrelevant. Number of times or people that you have had sex with doesn't mean anything nor does it diminish you as a person.

How about you look at yourself first, and realize how many "red flags" you might raise? Probably the reason you can't get a date. People are not a series of "red flags". Until you learn how to accept people more kindly, and with more understanding, you'll only attract people as shallow, as brainwashed and as prejudiced as yourself.
Original post by Josb
"I'm pro-life".


Surely if you're pro-choice you'd respect her choice to be pro-life? :s-smilie:
When she's dying.




Original post by Lord Samosa
- When she's a Brexiter


:rolleyes: well that leaves like 10 million women for the rest of us ay ladies? :cool:
Original post by 0to100
:rolleyes: well that leaves like 10 million women for the rest of us ay ladies? :cool:


10 million really old women, yeah.
Original post by tazarooni89
10 million really old women, yeah.


Oh please nice little mass appeal cliche you spat there but there are tonnes of young women who voted to leave stop it :hahaha:
Reply 13
Original post by tazarooni89
Surely if you're pro-choice you'd respect her choice to be pro-life? :s-smilie:


That's a deal breaker for me.
Original post by Anthony Ludovici
I think it's useful to have a series of red-flags, centered around pattern recognition, which help to identify dysfunctional members of the opposite sex who would make for bad partners.

For me, these are:

- She doesn't have a good relationship with her father.
- She is open about "hating children".
- She regularly uses drugs.
- She dyes her hair pastel/bright colors (blue/green/orange).
- She has tattoos.
- She has had sex with a reckless number of partners.
- She engages in serial monogamy.
- She dislikes and traduces her own racial group, while worshipping others (think wiggers and asiaphiles).

How about you?


Drugs are a big no no as are neck tattoos also flesh rings also painfully shy girls there was one at a speed dating thing I went to we basically sat in silence for 4 minutes
When all her friends are good looking (by societys standards)

Meaning she only talks to good looking people= shallow *****
-smokes
-has tattoos
-ungentlemanly demeanour
-thin/lanky

:dontknow:
Original post by littlenorthernlass
-smokes
-has tattoos
:dontknow:


So no Suicide Girls?
- smokes
- really clingy
She's gotta be human and alive.

In all seriousness.

No Tatoos
Doesn't do drugs (including smoking)
No weird hair colours like green and ****
Can't be too much of a fluffy airhead tumblr creature.
Gotta have a sense of humour

Quick Reply