Post-referendum situation is looking increasingly undemocratic and unconstitutional

The "discuss" is implied, right?

Parliament nowadays has to approve wars, even 'small' ones, like the bombing of ISIL targets in Syria.

Yet the retiring Cameron position is to put the Cabinet Secretary in charge of it and carry it out essentially in secret.

Parliament must, must be the approving chamber before Article 50 can be invoked. Yet many in the Tory Party are acting as though this is already a done deal.

When Theresa May comes in to office, she must state right away that this will eventually go to Parliament and put back to the people if necessary.

If she doesn't say this, effectively, we will all know that our constitution as it stands has come to an end and British democracy is dead. The natural recourse of the people in that situation is insurrection and, if necessary, civil war.

The Tory Party are acting as though it's a "done deal" because the majority of the British people voted in order to leave the European Union, by a margin exceeding more than one million votes. If the triggering of Article 50 were to go into parliament, should any MPs choose to go against the democratic will of the nation, that would be both undemocratic and unconstitutional. A civil war occurs in places like Syria and Libya where their own people have been subject to oppression, dictatorship and manipulation. A civil war won't occur in Britain because Article 50 didn't go through parliament.

If the government are ignoring law, Parliament and constitution, then what recourse is left other than extra-parliamentary action?

The people have spoken!

The "discuss" is implied, right?

Not something Parliament needs to do for two reasons:

Prerogative power of the Crown can be used by the PM.

No government in the UK has ever gone against a referendum.

It would be nice if people were capable of understanding that when more people vote for one thing than another it is perfectly democratic for that things to be done, democracy means rule of the people, not "do what I don't because otherwise I'll have a tantrum"

Do you apply that to union membership when voting to strike?

Parliament must, must be the approving chamber before Article 50 can be invoked. Yet many in the Tory Party are acting as though this is already a done deal.

ByEeek, you are now UKIP . You are fighting for what they want. You are now part of the problem not the solution...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_devolution_referendum,_1979

No problem there though when it suits.

You really aren't going to win the argument if the best you can come up with is to ridicule me.

I have no idea about Switzerland but Scotland were promised (by the leaders of the three main political parties) that if they wished to remain in Europe, they should vote to remain part of the UK. That was the deal on the table and they accepted it. Things have changed. They can justifiably call a new referendum on that basis alone. They haven't yet though, so right now it is a none argument.

Could you please answer me a very simple question - what is the point in having a free vote, if the losing side get to nullify the vote because they believe the returned outcome to be "wrong"? You can't keep holding referendums until the "correct" result is returned. It doesn't work like that.

The 'people' were lied to repeatedly.

The people have spoken!

As were they were by remain. Notably by Ruth Davidson stating that Andrea Leadsom's values of 60% were lies, they were later checked to be 59%.

*

Not really.*

The 60% figure includes non-legislative regulations and etc.

An example of that in the UK would be the GMC changing regulations for Doctors.*
**
If you want to be fair then you should go through all of the regulations made by every public body in the UK and include that in the figure.

Obviously, no one will do that because that is stupid. *