LGBT+ Sex and Relationship Education

That was done by an islamic extremist. I don't really count since he most likely came from a third world country into America.

He was born in New York.

Parents came from the third world then. Doesn't matter really since the main issue is islamic culture which doesn't intergrate well with western values.

There is no third world. The Soviet Union fell a while ago, you might have noticed.

You say that as if Christianity, the country's most subscribed to religion, is compatible with 'western values'. If we're taking that to mean 'doesn't discriminate based on immutable qualities', then think again. Most denominations of Christianity still oppose homosexuality's acceptance, and one specific church, the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, didn't accept black people as being allowed to be priests until 1978. I won't even get started on the gender issues with Christianity.

The term third world is still appropriate to describe underdeveloped countries.

I don't see any Christians running around killing gays with guns and bombs, or cutting there heads off. Some might disagree sure and some might be vocal but actions speak louder than words and that's the main difference.

We have much stricter gun control laws than in the US, making it harder for lunatics to get them, and with a population that is 20% the size of the US, we are much less likely to have such terrible attacks, thankfully.

Oh heavens no. Normal sex ed is enough considering we get it at least once a month... And honestly if they did do this, I just wouldn't attend. I'd rather not have them force this information that I, personally will never need.

Oh heavens no. Normal sex ed is enough considering we get it at least once a month... And honestly if they did do this, I just wouldn't attend. I'd rather not have them force this information that I, personally will never need.

I really do not see how that is "Demisexual" I mean I would not want to have sex with a women I am not emotionally attached to eg a hooker. But that really is not something that needs a new name, quite frankly I do not think that is something special

Oh heavens no. Normal sex ed is enough considering we get it at least once a month... And honestly if they did do this, I just wouldn't attend. I'd rather not have them force this information that I, personally will never need.

This is about the education of LGBT relationships. What I am arguing is that there is no need to educate children about these relationships that in many cases result in no reproduction. We should not promoting these relationships to young children, lest more of them opt for not reproducing when they grow up, which by extension leads to a net decrease in our population. This is terrible for our economy.

While it's fine for LGBT individuals to sit through monthly classes full of information that they personally might never need?

You clearly know nothing of biology then- your digestive tract does lubricate somewhat.
Also explain the prostate then? Like the gland in men that makes homosexual sex really really good. Did God intentionally put a sex organ up men's anuses or..?

You clearly know nothing of biology then- your digestive tract does lubricate somewhat.
Also explain the prostate then? Like the gland in men that makes homosexual sex really really good. Did God intentionally put a sex organ up men's anuses or..?

cant they just keep it to gay and straight as those two terms beautifully catch all.

It is the lifestyle that God intends us to have. The homosexual lifestyle goes against God's wishes.