my comment was 80% joke tbh, more aimed at May's eagerness (or presumed eagerness) to push this legislation through. But saying that the if you've nothing to hide you have no worries or as long as it stop terrorists I want it, isn't a main argue I'd put up against snoopers charter. I agree with everything fizzle said in terms of security and keeping us 'safe' it adds nothing in the grand scheme of things.
Wrt to These, legislation already exist that gives security services enough power to snoop and monitor. Yes spying and data collection already exist. But there has to be a limit (for me it's pushing for weakening of encryption key).
The real issue is, drum roll, resources. See the lee Rigby case. But then when MPs ask to be an exception to this law, it makes you go hmmmmmm.......
My biggest issue with the legislation is that the Intent and execution is/ going to be poor. It's poor value for money and like I said given that resources is what caused lee Rigby to happen, there's better way to use that money. Also people that know **** about data collection and isp have already pretty much labelled it a failure and given that the NHS data collection had to be scrapped, I'm probably on their side.