20 Right wing men rub fake poo on a four-year-old Asian girl’s face outside a pub

Knew that the thread would be hijacked by people trying to excuse and justify this. Watching and cheering him on makes them complicit in the attack, it's NOT rocket science.

So many hateful people on this forum.

Have you even read the posts? No-one's been justifying the attack.

To be fair, her family are probably linked with terrrorism. What kind of poobags make a four year old wear a headscarf? I think that's indicative of extreme views.

Have you even read the posts? No-one's been justifying the attack.


To be fair, her family are probably linked with terrrorism. What kind of poobags make a four year old wear a headscarf? I think that's indicative of extreme views.

**** like this makes my blood boil like wtfff.

20 Right wing men rub fake poo on a four-year-old Muslim, Asian girl’s face outside a pub in a racism attack,
They were targeted because they were wearing headscarves and Asian clothes.

http://metro.co.uk/2016/07/19/men-rubbed-fake-poo-on-four-year-old-girls-face-in-racist-attack-6015714/

oh, i see the lying."(..)One man attacked the young child and her grandmother, while his 20 or so friends laughed and cheered, outside the Royal Exchange in Cornmarket at around 4pm.(..)"

so- @PrincessZara, do you always manipulate like that or only in topic related to the muzzies?

not to mention that forcing 4 year old to wear a head scarf is idiotic. or were they afraid it will sexually provoke (muslim) men?

Nawaz’s sister believes they were targeted because they were wearing headscarves and Asian clothes.

Police are treating the incident as racially motivated.

Can I just say, and advise, that you do what I did. Just leave this thread. It has become ugly. People are blaming the girl and her parents and Muslims in this. I would never have thought we will hit this low... but here we are.

This is the most depressing thread in ages.

Islamic culture? The same reason why any other family of a certain culture will make their children wear cultural clothing.

But of course, making your child wear a headscarf is a stone throw away from putting on a suicide vest.

Who on this thread said that? You took a little girl being attacked and brought islam into it.

You are disgusting vile person. I feel sorry for anyone who has the misfortune of knowing you in real life. You give us a bad name. Shame on you. This is a little girl who has zero things to do with Islamic terrorism (just like the actual Billion others of Muslims) and you STILL thought it was appropriate to compare it and and say islamic terrorism is worse.

Yes it is worse, but this has nothing to do with that. A girl was attacked. This is some ones little daughter, someone's little girl.

Idiot go away.

People are finally starting to fight back.

The bottom line is your brought islamic terrorism and compared it to this attack. You are not stupid, you know what you are doing. You still are vile. Eff off please.

In a nutshell the purpose of the headscarf is to be sexually unappealing. A child shouldn't be wearing one, because it implies that a child is a valid target of lust. So either the family think there might be another Muhammed around, or they're dangerously attached to their culture, which might suggest extreme views.

No one did. You brought up islamic terrorism out of the blue. If some leftist do what you claim, we, dear sweetie, would be on the same side here.

But you went ahead and said what you said, and you still defend it.

In a nutshell the purpose of the headscarf is to be sexually unappealing. A child shouldn't be wearing one, because it implies that a child is a valid target of lust. So either the family think there might be another Muhammed around, or they're dangerously attached to their culture, which might suggest extreme views.

I'm not the one to direct that question at, with respect I think you might have missed my point. To answer your question though, I absolutely do think islamic face coverings should be banned.

oh, i see the lying."(..)One man attacked the young child and her grandmother, while his 20 or so friends laughed and cheered, outside the Royal Exchange in Cornmarket at around 4pm.(..)"

so- @PrincessZara, do you always manipulate like that or only in topic related to the muzzies?

not to mention that forcing 4 year old to wear a head scarf is idiotic. or were they afraid it will sexually provoke (muslim) men?

RIGHT WING TERROR: Smears poo on 4 year old girl (Ew, disgusting, reprehensible), 1 proper recent terror attack (Brevik)

ISLAMIC TERROR: Run over and kill around 80 people with a truck (Disgusting, Reprehensible, Evil), weekly murders, honour killings, and bombings.

Also, 20 people to 1 4 year old girl?

while you're at it, bring up the nazi regime too

Power trip. Humiliation, domination, displaying hatred? Who knows, the far right are a sick bunch of *******. They really are vile human beings.

If you honestly can't answer a question, admit it. Don't talk **** and pretend it justifies your opinion:

Treaty of Versailles - Wasn't passed by Nazis so has no bearing on how right wing or otherwise the Nazis were. Did indeed lead to a rise in nationalist sentiments, but seeing as nationalist sentiment is hardly exclusive to the far right, it's just as pervasive amongst the far left and even more moderate groups, that doesn't really prove anything.

Fear of Communism - We feared the spread of communism in Britain, as evidenced by the cold war, but we had plenty of Labour administrations over that duration. Fear of communism =/= Far right.

Economic issues in Germany - Did indeed lead to a rise in nationalist sentiments (though I'd suggest that the occupation of the Ruhr was more responsible for this than the Wall Street Crash) though again, doesn't by any means imply that the Nazis must have been far right. In fact, the Nazi economic policies of the 1930s featured a huge amount of state intervention, most notably through mass infrastructure projects, nationalisation and the curbing of a free market, which are fairly left wing policies. Note especially the similarity to Stalin's desire for state control of the 'commanding heights' of the Soviet economy.

Social issues in Germany - Again, you seem to be suggesting that because the Nazis rose to power on a wave of nationalist sentiments, they must be far right. As someone previously mentioned, the SNP are an example of a left wing party who very recently have gained power on the back of nationalist sentiments, so your reasoning is flawed. And if we consider actual Nazi social policies, again we see plenty of left wing ideology shining through. The 'Strength through Joy' and 'Beauty of Labour' campaigns were undeniably left wing, and the Nazi policies on healthcare, education, maternity and pensions were also fairly left leaning.

Isolationism in Europe - The Nazis hardly followed an isolationist foreign policy; they were positively expansionist! And neither isolationist nor expansionist foreign policies are inherently right wing; China and North Korea/Russia respectively refute any such suggestion.

To suggest that Nazis are right wing or left wing is a gross oversimplification. The original Nazi party espoused views from all over the political spectrum. It was only following the Night of the Long Knives that we begin to see a turn towards the political right, and even then there are still more than a handful of socialist policies. What you should really infer from all this, is that ironically the far left and far right actually share a huge amount of common ground. I would suggest the far right is closer to the far left than the moderate right, and vice versa.