US airstrikes kill as many as 160 civilians

This is why most who object to it tend to be either sympathetic to the cause of ISIS or (in most cases to be fair) thick, ignorant or child-like in their thinking. The responses in this thread - including the person you're responding to - is a prime example. OP falls into the former catagory though*

I think you've misunderstood what she was saying. The GIF wasn't even her post, it was from who she was quoting.

Then what makes you so different to them? You're willing to murder civilians and innocents for a goal, just like them.

I wasn't even quoting anyone, I'm so confused.. I swear I was agreeing with her?!

This thread is full of apologists who are fine if muslims are killed but cause an uproar if people in France die.

BOTH ARE EQUALLY AS BAD AS EACH OTHER. YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED.

This action that killed 160 Muslims civilians prevented the impending killing of many more by magnitudes you moron. What would you prefer? They didn't do it and watch ISIS continue their march to Baghdad and slaughter thousands? Would you have preferred these strikes not to happen and watch ISIS slaughter hundreds of thousands of Muslim Kurds as they were about to do? Would you have preferred avoiding these 160 deaths so that thousands more Yazidis could be killed and taken as sex slaves?

This is how dumb some of you lot are. You can't see past your noses. 160 civilian deaths to save thousands and thousands more and you call the proponents of this "apologists". What a mong.