Step 1 to solving this problem, is actually letting people talk about it.
Ofcourse on the internet its free reign - but in person, especially within universities and through the media.. my own experiance has been that any slightly negative view on unlimited immagaration, is met with waves of negativitiy and dismissal.
Pretty sure if I voiced some of my (in my opinion moderate) views on immigration at a university campus today, I would be branded a UKIP supporter and dismissed instantly.. (even though I am not a UKIP supporter, and am completely in favor of controlled immigration)
-- Opinions such as:
Some migrant groups do not integrate as well within our society..
Some religions need more careful care and support with integration then others..
Full scale mass immigration can cause an unstable social structure within an area..
2nd and 3rd generation immigrants face their own unique problems.. they are not just a non-issue once we get past 1st generation..
etc.
should not be shouted down but listened to, as they draw on real issues that we are facing.
Instead we have one side of a debate who is just shouting racism.. and the other side is completely mis-dirrecting their anger at Islam, instead of focusing on why the 0.00whatever % are acting out..
Mass immigration as we have right now, and for the past generation, is untested waters.. its never been done before in the same way, and we need to accept that its not just Immagaration = good, or bad.. but rather its a spectrum, and one that we can constatly refine and improve on.
I remember a while back during the referendum campaign, a Remain voter was defending immigration by showing how economically beneficial it was to us.. which I would not argue at all against.. But the question is not is it good - it is how can it be better.
How can we make it even more financially beneficial..
how can we make the already good (much better then France) inclusion, even better..
Etc.
In the mean time just thank god we one of the best intelligent services around..