why are most homophobes a*******?

Part of me wants to say they have parents to teach them morals, but older people are often found to be less tolerant so that probably wouldn't be much better. But still they should use common sense to teach them morals. If two consenting people are happy and in love, not hurting anyone, why should anyone else have a problem with it?

Luckily no western country punishes homosexuals, to my knowledge. I personally dont actually care if someone is gay or not, but what I do not like is the over-the-top flamboyant behaviour that some people exhibit. I would also dislike this behaviour in any straight person, by the way.



@loveleest


No, thats not the case. "I personally dont actually care if someone is gay or not, but what I do not like is the over-the-top flamboyant behaviour that some people exhibit. I would also dislike this behaviour in any straight person, by the way."


In conclusion: A society cannot be humanistic and advocate equal rights if not all people and social groups are equal (at least in front of the law). 100% social equality will never be reached however. Its a complete Utopia.

I accept that all humans are equal before the law, that doesnt mean I have to personally like them, does it?

In fact, I strongly oppose the idea of the state getting involved in a private companies decision. For example when a christian bakery refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple. It is their right to deny anyone service for whatever reason. Thats the drawback of free speech. There is nothing more immoral than the state getting involved to dictate who the bakery has to serve.

Yes, Im an atheist.

If most of the world are ********s doesn't that diminish the term?

Does it surprise you that most of the world are *******s?

Does it surprise you that most of the world are *******s?

Most people aren't actually homophobic just have different preferences and are scared of the unknown/closely guarded. Also, such a thing as heterophobia exists.

You could use this exact same argument for denying say a black and a white person a wedding cake because you believe its wrong.Exceptions on the ground of religous beliefs is just discrimination by another name and I dont see why special exceptions should be made for religous people, simply because they believe a book of old myths to be true.

In fact, I strongly oppose the idea of the state getting involved in a private companies decision. For example when a christian bakery refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple. It is their right to deny anyone service for whatever reason. Thats the drawback of free speech. There is nothing more immoral than the state getting involved to dictate who the bakery has to serve.

All they've done is lose themselves business through their outdated beliefs.

what about homophobic people who don't do anything bad against homosexuals. are they still a*********?

Depends what you mean by not to anything bad. Most people who I've come across have been verbally abusive rather than physically abusive- they're still *******s.

i mean the ones who dont act upon their dislike.They just accept it even though they dont agree with it

what about homophobic people who don't do anything bad against homosexuals. are they still a*********?