Yeah igy. I personally found the paper quite good, apart from the fact I did a silly mistake on one question, but I'm pretty sure I answered the rest correctly.
I screwed up one of the graph ones where you had to split it into shapes, but overall it was tough but not impossible. C4 is another matter, and bless the poor people with those M1 boundaries. Also, S1 this year was a much nicer paper than 2015?! Ah well, if these are correct, Lord help us all tomorrow....
Hi can someone please please please check what 32/50 is for Edexcel Religious Studies Implications Unit 4 Philosophy of Religion. I can't check because I'm on iPad. I'm really nervous so I'd be really grateful if someone checked!
I screwed up one of the graph ones where you had to split it into shapes, but overall it was tough but not impossible. C4 is another matter, and bless the poor people with those M1 boundaries. Also, S1 this year was a much nicer paper than 2015?! Ah well, if these are correct, Lord help us all tomorrow....
Yeah I did M1 too I'm surprised about S1 though, my frieds loved it yet the GB for that was hella low!
There's hardly any chance that the grade boundaries are fake cause its hosted on qualifications.pearson.comUnless they got hacked, or edexcel made a mistake, no way its fake.....
I haven't looked through the URL properly but ther other thing is the design of the front page, everything else published so far this year (that I have seen including things published in the last month) has been in a different design (same as last year) but these are different
I'm not saying three are definitely fake but I'm not 100% convinced they're legit
Omg i got bad grades, this is fake ... common people admit it , its a real .. why would anyone spend all of his time editing all of it to troll students
Omg i got bad grades, this is fake ... common people admit it , its a real .. why would anyone spend all of his time editing all of it to troll students
Maybe it was John's uncle bc he was pissed at how many students complained.