The Guardian: The last days of a white world (please read this concerning article)

Y'all criticise white people for not having a lot of children. Well, *clap* *clap* to the minorities who have lot's of children. After all, our population has only sky-nuclear-rocketed in the past century to 7 Billion people and growing. Good for them for create a strain on resource demand and ten-folding environmental pollution.

We should congratulate them because they're ethnic minorities and obviously everything they do, even if it causes the end of civilization and the destruction of the human race, is brilliant! White people are obviously bad, and minorities are obviously good because they're not the majority. And, anyway, white people clearly deserve this because they're stupid enough to not have enough children to use resources and take up space, unlike the minorities which have loads of children which isn't selfish at all.

There's no threat to the continued existence of Britain either. But Japan's aging population is going to exert a huge burden on their economy - to an extent this has already begun.

I doubt many Londoners feel more isolated than those living in other parts of our nation.

Multiculturalism is about culture, not race.

Technology and rising average income has also driven the change in migration patterns. A poor family in Western China would now be able to migrate to another country when that would have been financially and technologically impossible over fifty years ago.

I also disagree with the idea that only a homogenous society can have a feeling of 'community or shared purpose'.

why cant these brownies just **** off back home

Doesn't really disprove what I said. It is policy that drives immigration.

And with regards to community, the problem is you think in the theoretical. Yes maybe in theory a multicultural society could be as cohesive and have as strong communities as one where people have the same roots (it's sounds absurd to me even in words) but the reality is it doesn't turn out that way. According to studies carried out on the topic higher diversity areas have. Lower confidence in local government, local leaders and the local news media. Lower political efficacy – that is, confidence in one's own influence. Lower frequency of registering to vote, but more interest and knowledge about politics and more participation in protest marches and social reform groups. Higher political advocacy, but lower expectations that it will bring about a desirable result. Less expectation that others will cooperate to solve dilemmas of collective action (e.g., voluntary conservation to ease a water or energy shortage). Less likelihood of working on a community project. Less likelihood of giving to charity or volunteering. Fewer close friends and confidants. Less happiness and lower perceived quality of life. More time spent watching television and more agreement that "television is my most important form of entertainment".

It's so sad. We're becoming a minority in many areas of our own countries, which is really sad.

To those who say we need to have more children, the world population is already far too large. I think instead the emphasis should be on bringing down birth rates in high-birth rate places.

The ideal world population in my opinion would be between 3 and 4 billion.

I didn't say it disproved what you said. My point was that the technological change in recent decades has allowed for the demographic make-up of immigrants to change whilst the policies have remained the same. An immigration quota fifty years ago would have a very different effect on immigration than it would now.


Areas with greater diversity also tend to be considerably poorer. That could account for a few of things you listed. Unless you have a link to a study which isolates the effects of diversity?

Look up Robert D Putnam, I'm pretty sure that other factors were taken into account in his studies.

Is it really that hard to believe that areas where people have no common heritage have less community then places where people share the same heritage? It is a completely logical extension of how communities naturally develop.

A town where everyone's families have been living for generations is always going to have a stronger community then a town where everyone is a 1st or 2nd generation immigrants, I don't see how anyone can really deny this without a poor knowledge how how human beings are.

But if you have any problem with that profound demographic and cultural shift turning your country into an unrecognisable identityless wasteland with no community or shared purpose?

Japan's ageing population is an existential threat to their future prosperity.

There is a direct correlation between level of economic income and fertility rates, hence why the most advanced countries in the world often struggle with their country's birthrates. There are many non-white countries out there which also have a declining population: namely China, Japan, Vietnam, South Korea and the UAE.

However, this was an article published by the Guardian and a lot of the points made can easily be disproved.

In the USA, although the number of non-white Hispanics is expected to drop below 50%, the number of whites as a proportion of the population is expected to stay the same by 2060. At present, the number of non-white Hispanics is 62.2%, but in 2060 the number of whites (inluding Hispanics) is expected to be at 68.5%.

https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf

In Brazil, the number of whites is expected to increase. According to birth data published this year, the number of whites among 0-4 has increased to 48% whereas the number of blacks has decreased to 4.5%.

In the UK, by 2050 it is expected that that over 2/3 of the population will still be white with only 5% of the population identifying as black, which utterly disproves any mention of a black majority by 2050.

Skin colour shouldn't be an issue; yes, there might be some genetic differences between people of different races but I it's proven it's environment factors such as culture that really cause differences.
I absolutely think all races should be treated as equal but I'm not sure all cultures can be deemed as that way.

Can't wait

Well if you are that keen, I highly recommend you move to Zimbabwe or South Africa, or even cities like Detroit or the most Islamic areas of Bradford. Then you will get a taste of just how great it is being a white minority.

Whites aren't even the indigenous population of the US and certain parts of the US have long been populated by Hispanics. Hawaii itself was never a white state.

Japan's ageing population is an existential threat to their future prosperity.

There is no political or cultural movement to make white people 'extinct'.