Number of migrants claiming benefits in Germany surged by 169 percent from 2014-2015

joke around all you want, but we both know its because you can't defend a discriminatory argument on the basis that less than 1% of those you're discriminating actually deserve it

Any relation to @lolatmaths ?

You are full of ad-hominems; are the statistics correct or not?

Same here: http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=4302672&p=67437732#post67437732 The source is the Austrian Ministry of the Interior, which isn't good enough for our A-level history? student.

Very little people realize this actually.
Murdering people for drawing some caricatures is much simplier case, than political (failed) agendas.

The westerners don't know what are they supporting. The muslims probably do, murder for opinion is far simplier to recognize.

That's Germany choice they are a rich country and they can afford to look after the refugees. However, if it was the UK who was spending so much on refugees then I would be expecting an uprising because there are so many homeless and people relying on food banks

the primary reason for the rise of Islamic extremism is Western foreign policy.

So it's Britain's responsibility to be the US's dog and help ruin countries around the world but when it comes to taking responsibility for their crimes, oh no! We have too many "poor" people to take in a few thousand more.

Oh I see- your excuse is ignorance. Much intelligence, Wow.

The Westerners know exactly what they are supporting.

Being dumb isn't an excuse for mass murder, colonialism and exploitation.

assuming that the far-right source is correct and hasn't pulled any more strings to promote its hateful agenda, but I wouldn't expect you to understand, your interpretation of media bias and source reliability is pretty weak, you had the same issue with the FPO yesterday

You do realise that the situation in Syria is caused by a spontaneous insurrection by Moslems against an oppressive regime? Where do you stand? Perhaps you would prefer your Moslem brothers to knuckle down and continue putting up with the Assads.

Of course they don't. Otherwise political campaigns would look differently, as well as most of political statements on foreign policy.
You know whats going on, I know whats going on, but average voter doesn't.




Sure it isn't. But I bet you would feel much safer having dinner with some dumb blondie, or some nice idiot Jeff who thinks that all America wants is freedom for people around the world, than while meeting a muslim who feels sympathy towards guys who shot a group of people, only because they had draw a caricature of some person who lived in medieval times, had not very best morality for modern standards and the story says that this person flew to heaven on flying horse.

You inisist on claiming that ignorance is the same as sympathy to people who murder others because they have different opinion, and morover, those murderer's opinions lack any evidence to support it.
Sorry, I don't agree with it, and don't jump on my intelligence if you don't wish me to jump on yours.

Why do you think the Muslim world has gone from being generally secular 40 years ago to being more and more Islamist/radical?

You are claiming that the main reason Moslems are using literal interpretations of the Koran (or, in fact, returning to Mohammedan intentions) is that some politicians in the west are forcing or encouraging them to make those interpretations. There is no sense or logic in that. Have you any evidence for that claim?

If western foreign policy changed, are you claiming that these people would somehow be persuaded that their interpretations are incorrect and they would revert to more popular interpretations?

Do I get a cookie if I give a nice answer?

Western foreign policy, 100%!

No.

I was referring to the rise of Sunni extremism in Iraq- fuelled by the American funding of genocidal Shia militias, the complete dismemberment of the Iraqi army after the fall of Saddam Hussain and of course the actual invasion.

Why do you think the Muslim world has gone from being generally secular 40 years ago to being more and more Islamist/radical?

No.

I was referring to the rise of Sunni extremism in Iraq- fuelled by the American funding of genocidal Shia militias, the complete dismemberment of the Iraqi army after the fall of Saddam Hussain and of course the actual invasion.

Ha! Those Syrian refugees that are flooding into Europe.

IS, of course, traces its origins all the way back to Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad in 1999 in Jordan - nothing to do with Irag or the USA. It is just a bunch of particularly successful opportunistic Salafist militants with a mission to rule the world.

You forget to mention how their Koranic interpretations will change if the US changes its foreign policy. Perhaps there is a reason for that.

d lead them into the arms of Wahabbis and other filth