Do you agree with abortion??

disagree with it in almost all cases apart from incest and rape

Disagree apart from incest, rape and danger to mother's or child's life. If you don't want to take care of it, you can put it up for adoption. If you feel to guilty doing that, you should've thought of that before you ****ed a guy.

Okay so many problems with his ''destruction''

45 ranting about killing baby - She's not literally think about killing her child 1 minute before giving birth how stupid is he.

1:15 ranting about killing babies - Okay so I suppose this guy must break his heart when he stands on a snail, when he allows for a cow to be killed to eat steak, when he allows for a chicken to be killed etc. etc. There is no difference between that little cluster of cells in a woman's body and these animals, you can shove the word "KILL" on anything, doesn't change a thing. "Look at the chicken burger from an animal you had KILLED", "Look at the snail you KILLED". etc.

2:00 - After the 24 week cut off, well there you go... he literally just ruined his own point because it's not a LEGAL ABORTION? JFC. Also many European countries have a cut off of around 12-14 weeks.

2:40 - Not a 'kid', not a 'child'.

2:50 - "You don't have a right to kill it", well yes you do as it's your body and your entitlement.

3:15 - Yes its own rights are more important than the baby's convenience whilst it's in the womb. God he probably would let women give birth even if they were going to die just for the child.

4:00 - Once again, using the word 'murder' doesn't make anything different.

4:05 - Yes actually you do get to choose other people's outcomes in life. "Pulling the plug" and the death sentence are two good examples. Also stop referring to the foetus as "someone" it's not yet.

4:15 - Omg when the baby has tastebuds? God forbid.... and fingernails and teeth...

4:45 - "BEGINNINGS OF" =/= fully formed at all, greatly overexaggerated.

5:10 - "Personal convenience issue", goddamn I'm not even a ****ing woman but if I met this guy irl I would punch him so hard in the ****ing gob purely for referring to abortion as that. Don't ever ****ing describe it as that issue, especially to anyone who was raped.

5:30 - He just compared this to slavery and hitler, bye.

5:40 - Right, and allowing women to die just to give birth was one of those disgusting legal things in the past

6:10 - Can't call something that's incapable of comitting any act 'innocent', since it can't be 'guilty' either.

6:45 - Sure, when it's born it's a human.

--

Okay how the ****ing hell are morons on YouTube defending this? All he's doing is scaremongering people by using words such as 'kill' and murder' alongside cute words like 'innocent' to make the act seem worse than it actually is. The entire thing is so greatly over-exaggerated and is full of complete crap.I am prochoice and always will be. And hopefully morons like this never influence any governmental policy regarding abortion ever... but then again, this is the states so.

Around 6% of rape reports result in a conviction - based on that, how do you propose your system would work?

I just watched this YouTube video which gives a lot of weight to the pro-life argument.

Watch here:
[video="youtube;RDmwPGrZkYs"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDmwPGrZkYs[/video]

Every woman that wants to abort would say that she has been raped under that system. It cannot requires a conviction, as judicial enquiries and trials often take several years.

Around 6% of rape reports result in a conviction - based on that, how do you propose your system would work?

That is one of the rape statistics that has been reported as a myth multiple times. It's just another lie perpetuated by the feminists because muh patriarchy.

with a username like yours, you're *obviously* not biased about this, aren't you...this couldn't possibly have any connection to your religion, which you were raised with...

with a username like yours, you're *obviously* not biased about this, aren't you...this couldn't possibly have any connection to your religion, which you were raised with...

It's been a frightening aspect of human behaviour throughout history, that they define who is human and who isn't, who has the right to life and who doesn't, based on whatever happens to suit them at the time. And then the majority of the thoughtless population, rather than questioning or calling out the killings for what they are, become very acclimatised to it and emotionally detached from those victims, and consider it to be normal feeling that "It's only a [whatever] that's being killed, not a proper person like me".

The fact of the matter is that for most of you, your moral aversion to something being killed primarily depends on what happens to be normal at the time. If you had been a Dutch settler in southern Africa in the 1930s, you'd probably think it was morally acceptable to hunt the indigenous black people, because they were sub-human. If you had been an Arabian living in the 1400s, you'd probably think it was perfectly normal to bury your own newborn daughter alive just for being female. If you had been a German who had Jews getting exterminated in your back yard, you might well have been the train driver who took them to their deaths, or the architect who designed the gas chambers, or the bystander who did, said and thought nothing about it - as was the case with pretty much everyone at the time.

I think the killing of unborn children could be something that will make future civilisations will look back on us with disdain, thinking "how could they have possibly lived with themselves after doing something like that?", the way we do to other societies now. We wonder why nobody used to bat an eyelid at these atrocities, and yet most of us would have done the same thing in the same situation, as much as we might like to think otherwise. And now, when it suits us to be able to enjoy sex with whomever we want without taking responsibility for the consequences, when it suits us to be able to curb the population in an overcrowded world, when it becomes convenient for us to kill off a certain type of person, we begin to exclude them from the category of "human being" in order to normalise it and help ourselves sleep at night, like so many before us used to do.



We seriously exceed our own authority when we step in to make decisions about which members of our species are "real" humans and which ones aren't, because the fact is that we don't know anything about what gives rise, as opposed to a vegetative or robotic existence, to someone's awareness, experiences, desires, and fundamentally the preference to live rather than die. I'm all for the "right to choose", but did anybody find out from that unborn child, whether they would rather live or die if given the choice? Maybe if it had the ability to express itself, we'd be able to find out, but as it stands nobody really knows. So rather than dressing up this "24 week limit" as some kind of implication that we know the exact point at which a meaningful life begins, let's just be honest about the way in which our society has formed its view on abortion - based on no sound philosophical reasoning at all, but on whatever is convenient for us at the time.