No, you are trying to force your sectarianism on the I-Soc. You could quite have easily edited the OP to make it more welcoming, but you refused. It says a lot about you.
You should read the I-Soc rules, as the edit by CT quite clearly explains why you are in the wrong for your sectarianism comments. And we are talking specifically about debates regarding validity of sects. Follow the conversation please. I said you should take debates regarding sects and their validity outside of the society.
What a load of drivel. So you have no point to make?
I've address your points. But your need to be puerile sure shows your incapability to debate this topic.
I said I report the comments. They get deleted. But the reason the CT edited the OP and posted in the I-Soc is because of the issue of sectarian comments. So the CT also see the issue.
What a load of rubbish. You really will come up with any trite to defend your bigotry and hatred. There is no proof that you can bring forward that non-Muslims and lay Muslims only want to learn Sunni Islam and not Shia Islam. Rather, you want to force the I-Soc to become an I-Soc which only presents your interpretation of Islam and want every to perceive that to be the single only valid interpretation.
It's not, as evidenced by the sectarian comments and the refusal to edit the OP to make the society more inclusive.
The CT was referring to sectarian comments. I can quote the CT in question into this thread and they will validate what the purpose behind the OP edit was. I can assure you, it had everything to do with sectarian comments.