Muslim child reported to police for 'bullet' which was just piece of brass
Scroll to see replies
Original post by Plantagenet Crown
How is saying Islam =/= Muslims politically correct? It's fact and anyone who reads my posts knows I'm anything but politically correct.
I don't follow your logic. Anyone who does anything inappropriate should be criticised, be they Muslim or non-Muslim. My point is that many people fear criticising Muslims for doing certain things because they're scared of how they'll be labelled, whereas they'd have no problem criticising non-Muslims for doing the same thing.
I don't follow your logic. Anyone who does anything inappropriate should be criticised, be they Muslim or non-Muslim. My point is that many people fear criticising Muslims for doing certain things because they're scared of how they'll be labelled, whereas they'd have no problem criticising non-Muslims for doing the same thing.
...Calm down and evaluate your clear change of tone. I can't go thru this all day.
Point is: you tiptoe around here saying Islam=/=Muslim trying to convince people that you don't have an issue with Muslims, rather only an issue with their religion ("logic") simply in favour of the massive Muslim demographic here (politically correct). But now you're suddenly saying you don't get why no one insults them (180). Get it? Good night.
(edited 7 years ago)
#infantile tantrum Of course not.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/3487981/Gang-member-13-youngest-in-Britain-for-handgun-conviction.html
Do you have anything to offer apart from unsupported assertion?
Original post by Lost Her Way
The context matters, a kid is not going to have a gun here.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/3487981/Gang-member-13-youngest-in-Britain-for-handgun-conviction.html
Do you have anything to offer apart from unsupported assertion?
Original post by 0to100
I mean it literally is a 180. You can get aggressive if you want to but you can't go around being politically correct for social favour memeing people with "Islam=/=Muslims" and then being indignant that no one wants to criticise Muslims. 
1. Criticising Islam is not the same as criticising Muslims.
2. Not justifiably criticising an individual Muslim because of their actions, due to fear of being labelled a bigot.
To clarify - you can't criticise a Muslim for simply being a Muslim, but you can criticise them if they behave in an unacceptable manner.
Example - you can't condemn all Muslims for condoning domestic violence, but you can condemn individual Muslims if they claim that sura 4:34 is perfect, immutable, universal and timeless.
Original post by 0to100
lol whattt
Original post by 0to100
...Calm down and evaluate your clear change of tone. I can't go thru this all day.
Point is: you tiptoe around here saying Islam=/=Muslim trying to convince people that you don't have an issue with Muslims, rather only an issue with their religion ("logic"
simply in favour of the massive Muslim demographic here (politically correct). But now you're suddenly saying you don't get why no one insults them (180). Get it? Good night.
Point is: you tiptoe around here saying Islam=/=Muslim trying to convince people that you don't have an issue with Muslims, rather only an issue with their religion ("logic"
simply in favour of the massive Muslim demographic here (politically correct). But now you're suddenly saying you don't get why no one insults them (180). Get it? Good night.Original post by QE2
You are conflating two different issues.
1. Criticising Islam is not the same as criticising Muslims.
2. Not justifiably criticising an individual Muslim because of their actions, due to fear of being labelled a bigot.
To clarify - you can't criticise a Muslim for simply being a Muslim, but you can criticise them if they behave in an unacceptable manner.
Example - you can't condemn all Muslims for condoning domestic violence, but you can condemn individual Muslims if they claim that sura 4:34 is perfect, immutable, universal and timeless.
1. Criticising Islam is not the same as criticising Muslims.
2. Not justifiably criticising an individual Muslim because of their actions, due to fear of being labelled a bigot.
To clarify - you can't criticise a Muslim for simply being a Muslim, but you can criticise them if they behave in an unacceptable manner.
Example - you can't condemn all Muslims for condoning domestic violence, but you can condemn individual Muslims if they claim that sura 4:34 is perfect, immutable, universal and timeless.
Why?
Is it not the same as condemning all Christians, Jews, Whites, Blacks for condoning domestic violence?
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by 0to100
...Calm down and evaluate your clear change of tone. I can't go thru this all day.
Point is: you tiptoe around here saying Islam=/=Muslim trying to convince people that you don't have an issue with Muslims, rather only an issue with their religion ("logic" simply in favour of the massive Muslim demographic here (politically correct). But now you're suddenly saying you don't get why no one insults them (180). Get it? Good night.
Point is: you tiptoe around here saying Islam=/=Muslim trying to convince people that you don't have an issue with Muslims, rather only an issue with their religion ("logic"
simply in favour of the massive Muslim demographic here (politically correct). But now you're suddenly saying you don't get why no one insults them (180). Get it? Good night.I'm perfectly calm, perhaps it's you who needs to take a chill pill and get your position clear because it's making no sense at all.
Absolutely false. I don't tiptoe round anyone. When a Muslim does an inappropriate action I will have no problem criticising that Muslim. And I also have no problem criticising Islam.
I am saying nothing of the sort, learn the difference between criticism and insulting. I have said already that many people fear criticising Muslims for fear of being called islamophobic when this absurd political correctness shouldn't exist. What that boy did was dumb and the school rightly reported it. The fact he's Muslim doesn't change my opinion on that.
Note that I'm not saying Muslims should be criticised just for being Muslims nor have I ever said that.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by QE2
You are conflating two different issues.
1. Criticising Islam is not the same as criticising Muslims.
2. Not justifiably criticising an individual Muslim because of their actions, due to fear of being labelled a bigot.
To clarify - you can't criticise a Muslim for simply being a Muslim, but you can criticise them if they behave in an unacceptable manner.
Example - you can't condemn all Muslims for condoning domestic violence, but you can condemn individual Muslims if they claim that sura 4:34 is perfect, immutable, universal and timeless.
1. Criticising Islam is not the same as criticising Muslims.
2. Not justifiably criticising an individual Muslim because of their actions, due to fear of being labelled a bigot.
To clarify - you can't criticise a Muslim for simply being a Muslim, but you can criticise them if they behave in an unacceptable manner.
Example - you can't condemn all Muslims for condoning domestic violence, but you can condemn individual Muslims if they claim that sura 4:34 is perfect, immutable, universal and timeless.
...
You do understand I'm noticing contradictions in his posts...and that the whole islam=/=muslim thing is his ideology...not mine? And that the conversation was finished between me and him until you revived it? And now straight after you post to me he comes tagging along trying t get his digs in when he hasn't a foot to stand on?
Ok.
Original post by 0to100
...
You do understand I'm noticing contradictions in his posts...and that the whole islam=/=muslim thing is his ideology...not mine? And that the conversation was finished between me and him until you revived it? And now straight after you post to me he comes tagging along trying t get his digs in when he hasn't a foot to stand on?
Ok.
You do understand I'm noticing contradictions in his posts...and that the whole islam=/=muslim thing is his ideology...not mine? And that the conversation was finished between me and him until you revived it? And now straight after you post to me he comes tagging along trying t get his digs in when he hasn't a foot to stand on?
Ok.
It wasn't at all finished. Just because you don't get an instant reply doesn't mean a conversation is over. I fail to see any of these so-called contradictions in my post, I only see the confusing non-sequiturs you've come up with.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by Cherub012
Why?
Is it not the same as condemning all Christians, Jews, Whites, Blacks for condoning domestic violence?
Is it not the same as condemning all Christians, Jews, Whites, Blacks for condoning domestic violence?
As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them - Quran 4:34
One of the fundamental tenets of Islam is that the Quran is the actual word of god, dictated to Muhammad, the ultimate guide for all humanity, and is as perfect, unchangable, universal and timeless now as it was 1400 years ago.
In fact, it is considered an act of kufr (becoming non-Muslim) to reject even a single verse.
So not the same at all, because none of the groups you mentioned have such divine permission to use violence to discipline a disobedient wife.
Original post by 0to100
...
You do understand I'm noticing contradictions in his posts...and that the whole islam=/=muslim thing is his ideology...not mine? And that the conversation was finished between me and him until you revived it? And now straight after you post to me he comes tagging along trying t get his digs in when he hasn't a foot to stand on?
Ok.
You do understand I'm noticing contradictions in his posts...and that the whole islam=/=muslim thing is his ideology...not mine? And that the conversation was finished between me and him until you revived it? And now straight after you post to me he comes tagging along trying t get his digs in when he hasn't a foot to stand on?
Ok.
You are attempting to conflate two different and seperate concepts.
Just because you do not see this does not mean that it is not happening.
Original post by QE2
Seems pretty straightforward to me.
You are attempting to conflate two different and seperate concepts.
Just because you do not see this does not mean that it is not happening.
You are attempting to conflate two different and seperate concepts.
Just because you do not see this does not mean that it is not happening.
Right Idk when you and plantagenet crown started dating but if you can't see his hypocrisy I can't help you and honestly I can't be arsed either. Now my issue isn't much about muslims or islam I don't really care so continue this little chat with him since you agree with him so much
And yes congrats for knowing the words "conflation" and "conflate" anything else? Hope not because I won't be reading it.Anyway like I said before my opinion is this:
he shouldn't have said it or pretended he had a bullet, just so he can cry "Islamophobia" after, end of.
he shouldn't have said it or pretended he had a bullet, just so he can cry "Islamophobia" after, end of.
Original post by 0to100
Right Idk when you and plantagenet crown started dating but if you can't see his hypocrisy I can't help you and honestly I can't be arsed either. Now my issue isn't much about muslims or islam I don't really care so continue this little chat with him since you agree with him so much And yes congrats for knowing the words "conflation" and "conflate" anything else? Hope not because I won't be reading it.
And yes congrats for knowing the words "conflation" and "conflate" anything else? Hope not because I won't be reading it.Yet you haven't shown any hypocrisy and anyone reading my posts can see I have said nothing inconsistent. I have been quoting all your responses to me so I'm not sure where you're getting this conspiracy that QE2 and I are out to get you. Perhaps you're seeing what you want to see, just like you're seeing things in my posts that aren't there?
Original post by 0to100
useless post, stop trying to argue and clear off.
If you're going to falsely accuse someone of hypocrisy then expect them to reply, duh. And you should know better by now than to think telling someone to clear off over the internet is going to work.
Original post by Plantagenet Crown
Yet you haven't shown any hypocrisy and anyone reading my posts can see I have said nothing inconsistent. I have been quoting all your responses to me so I'm not sure where you're getting this conspiracy that QE2 and I are out to get you. Perhaps you're seeing what you want to see, just like you're seeing things in my posts that aren't there?
Exactly. You only came back because he whiteknighted for you which is cute on both your parts. Like aren't you an adult, you don't really need to buddy up with the 1st person who quotes me to get your point across do you? :\
Anyway I said what I had to say. Which is that you were being hypocritical. You dont have to agree but I'm not gonna keep explaining trying to get you to agree??? So stop triple-quoting me with [u]useless posts.
Original post by 0to100
Exactly. You only came back because he whiteknighted for you which is cute on both your parts. Like aren't you an adult, you don't really need to buddy up with the 1st person who quotes me to get your point across do you? :\
False. Making up things again just because you didn't get an instant reply. If you must know, I was watching ITV's Black Angel that I had recorded. You really need to stop getting so paranoid.
Anyway I said what I had to say. Which is that you were being hypocritical. You dont have to agree but I'm not gonna keep explaining trying to get you to agree??? So stop triple-quoting me with useless posts, stop trying to argue and clear off.
Yet I wasn't being hypocritical as you have utterly failed to show where this is so. Perhaps you're the hypocritical one who's telling me to stop arguing when it was you who first quoted me in this thread with a comment you knew would start an "argument"?
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by QE2
The Quran has a verse that specifically allows Muslims to beat their wives "if they fear disobedience" (under certain conditions).
As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them - Quran 4:34
One of the fundamental tenets of Islam is that the Quran is the actual word of god, dictated to Muhammad, the ultimate guide for all humanity, and is as perfect, unchangable, universal and timeless now as it was 1400 years ago.
In fact, it is considered an act of kufr (becoming non-Muslim) to reject even a single verse.
So not the same at all, because none of the groups you mentioned have such divine permission to use violence to discipline a disobedient wife.
As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them - Quran 4:34
One of the fundamental tenets of Islam is that the Quran is the actual word of god, dictated to Muhammad, the ultimate guide for all humanity, and is as perfect, unchangable, universal and timeless now as it was 1400 years ago.
In fact, it is considered an act of kufr (becoming non-Muslim) to reject even a single verse.
So not the same at all, because none of the groups you mentioned have such divine permission to use violence to discipline a disobedient wife.
Yeah sure. I was referring to the bit where you said: "You can't condemn all Muslims for condoning domestic violence."
Why not?
Original post by 0to100
Right Idk when you and plantagenet crown started dating but if you can't see his hypocrisy I can't help you and honestly I can't be arsed either. Now my issue isn't much about muslims or islam I don't really care so continue this little chat with him since you agree with him so much And yes congrats for knowing the words "conflation" and "conflate" anything else? Hope not because I won't be reading it.
And yes congrats for knowing the words "conflation" and "conflate" anything else? Hope not because I won't be reading it.Oh well.
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- Anyone willing to critique my Q5 English Language GCSE practice?
- Anyone experienced willing to critique my GCSE Q5 of English Language Paper 1?
- I’ve been harassed on Snapchat, what do I do?
- Gcse Music theory
- Dbs enhanced check
- Please help
- Advice on pictures being exposed that I didn't consent too
- Should I report my neighbour to social services now or later?
- UK Police
- 5 careers for criminology and criminal behaviour graduates
- Out of Control Animal
- Make it More Brass Instrument-ey !!
- Friend taken advantage of while very drunk
- i took off my hijab, family is crazy
- Unsupported Healthcare Student Operating Department Practitioner
- Antifa activist murdered in NYC
- this blew me away !
- How long does it take to get a crime reference number after reporting a crime?
- Would I get into trouble if I hand in a "stolen" phone which is mine to the police?
- Relationships as a police officer
Latest
Last reply 6 minutes ago
Official University of Edinburgh Applicant Thread for 2024Last reply 7 minutes ago
University of Oxford 2025 Undergraduate Applicants Official ThreadLast reply 10 minutes ago
Official UCL Offer Holders Thread for 2024 entryLast reply 11 minutes ago
Official: University of Leicester A199 (foundation year) 2024 entry applicantsPosted 12 minutes ago
University of Surrey academics back no confidence vote as 'morale is very low'Posted 14 minutes ago
Is SOAS the Right Choice for Comparative Literature MA? Insights Wanted!Last reply 18 minutes ago
Official University of the Arts London Applicant Thread for 2024Last reply 22 minutes ago
WJEC Eduqas English Literature prediction 2024Trending
Last reply 1 hour ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 2 hours ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 4 hours ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 1 week ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 4 weeks ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 1 hour ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 2 hours ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 4 hours ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 1 week ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 4 weeks ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
