Is it time to ban democracy?

So why should voters get punished just because they live in a highly populated state?

Don't tell me, my choice of wording offends you? Did it violate your safe space?

That's not political discourse. That's insulting the electorate. A radical idea, but liberals could try and allay immigration fears, debate why it's worth immigration is worth it, and cut out the condescending insults. And so forth with other political issues.
I did read what you said. Nothing of any substance. Even your explanation makes no sense. Millennials favouring Clinton prove jack, just as the war-protesting, tree-hugging hippies voting for Carter proved jack.

It's to stop liberals with their high-population states from skewing the election.

Don't tell me, my choice of wording offends you? Did it violate your safe space?

So as long as something is bad for liberals, it's good?

Usually, yes.

Also genuinely interested to know what you thought of Sanders? Even if you disagree with what he stood for do you not respect how he actually stands for something rather than the hollowness of Clinton?

And people never once pointed to the positive effects of immigration in the referendum? All they did was "but racist, shut up"? So you want people to not say the truth? You dismiss others as condescending just because you don't like being called out for what you are - a racist?

I never said it is "proving" anything. I said that in decades to come someone like Trump will never be voted in.

And look who is being condescending now. Add hypocrite to the list of your many flaws.

Your personality.

I don't believe in democracy, but even the masses, like a broken clock, can be right once in a while.

I would favour a benevolent dictatorship, but one led by a hard right-winger who would deport illegal immigrants, defend our culture and crush the Marxists infiltrating and subverting our society.

What a crap post. Anyway...

If a right wing society was really that great you'd be able to sell it to us on its own merits without all the ridiculous reds under the bed stuff.

Again, your missing the point. It's not one or the other. Unfortunately in the referendum is was too much belittling and insults from the left, and not enough positive arguments. And even the arguments offered didn't actually address the main issues- of regulated immigration and strain on social services.
But whatever, continue doubling down on what made Remain lose. As even super liberal Bill Maher had recognised, the left cried wolf too much with the racism card. It loses meaning and impact when you throw it around so casually. Now when the left use it, most swing voters just roll their eyes.

How am I being condescending? Do you find logical arguments too condescending? Is that why you only resort to petty insults?

I answered your question.

Don't blame me for your *****y question.

too much belittling and insults from the left, and not enough positive arguments.

Human beings are irrational, so it's much easier to scaremonger them into it.

There were enough positive arguments, as I repeatedly said that pandering to racists ideas just to get votes is not something that should be done, or you are just violating your own principles.

What you don't understand is that the "right" are just a bunch of whiny crybabies, oh boohoo our lives suck so much, oh boohoo they are calling us racist, oh boohoo I wanna be able to insult anyone, etc.

"Strain on social services" - final straw for me, one of the main arguments was just that, that immigration is a net contributor to said services. What you fail to see is that people want their biases and prejudices confirmed, so when someone like Trump comes along and says all that, or if someone like Farage or Johnson comes along and tells people oh no, outside the EU we can give the NHS 350m then that is all they will hear.

What's ironic is that you most likely consider yourself as intelligent, yet you fail to see past your own prejudices, even after they have been pointed out to you multiple times. Done wasting my time.