I am ALT-RIGHT AMA
Scroll to see replies
Original post by ntnm99
Reverse KKK? So they are black supremacists? They want to lynch, rape, beat white people? I highly doubt that.
And also, you're right, sometimes the person that is shot maybe was shot within the law. The problem still stands that there are far too many cases of people being shout WITHOUT firearms and WITHOUT criminal records. It still stands that there are far too many cases of black people being beaten and hurt brutally by the police unnecessarily. You'll find many cases online where you have to admit that the force used was unneeded, for example, Jasmin Darwin, Ben Fields and South Carolinian student, Dajerria Becton, Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner and hundreds more.
Also, on your 'unarmed' point, some statistics for you.
Source: https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/unarmed/
Police killed at least 102 unarmed black people in 2015, nearly twice each week.
Nearly 1 in 3 black people killed by police in 2015 were identified as unarmed, though the actual number is likely higher due to underreporting
37% of unarmed people killed by police were black in 2015 despite black people being only 13% of the U.S. population
Unarmed black people were killed at 5x the rate of unarmed whites in 2015
And also, you're right, sometimes the person that is shot maybe was shot within the law. The problem still stands that there are far too many cases of people being shout WITHOUT firearms and WITHOUT criminal records. It still stands that there are far too many cases of black people being beaten and hurt brutally by the police unnecessarily. You'll find many cases online where you have to admit that the force used was unneeded, for example, Jasmin Darwin, Ben Fields and South Carolinian student, Dajerria Becton, Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner and hundreds more.
Also, on your 'unarmed' point, some statistics for you.
Source: https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/unarmed/
Police killed at least 102 unarmed black people in 2015, nearly twice each week.
Nearly 1 in 3 black people killed by police in 2015 were identified as unarmed, though the actual number is likely higher due to underreporting
37% of unarmed people killed by police were black in 2015 despite black people being only 13% of the U.S. population
Unarmed black people were killed at 5x the rate of unarmed whites in 2015
Those statistics are loaded, the relevant statistics are crime related ones and not raw numbers: for instance blacks are 40% of the prison population in the US DESPITE being only 13% of the whole, there are problems with the black community that causes abnormally high crime rates, that I won't delve into detail but are basically the result of a dependency culture created by left wing parties being in government.
You also completely ignored my point with regards to clear racism and brutality against whites and other races that BLM brushes under the carpet and dismisses as not important, the fact that Symone Sanders, a prominent member of Bernie Sanders' presidential team and BLM activist said that the recent Chicago kidnapping was "not a hate crime" shows this perfectly.
If BLM were willing to become more inclusive, starting with a name change; as well as stopping revenge violence and idiotic riots, then perhaps I could support them. As it stands, I think they are a disgrace to the likes of Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks who fought for legitimate civil rights and racial harmony.
To answer your original question, yes, they are black supremacists, cut from the same cloth as the black panther party from the 70s.
Original post by yudothis
Both Brexit and more or less US election is binary...
You'll find they've both happened already and aren't ongoing, and there was more than one choice on the ballot papers in both instances and neither had compulsory voting and a system that is impossible to spoil.
The brexit question is straight up binary, what is the third option going to be which cannot be expressed via abstention? And as for US pres. Even if we ignore write in, the libertarians were on every single ballot, the greens for 44 states plus DC, McMullin had a fair few states (nearly all IG you include write in), Constitution Party had 24 states, 46 including write in.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by ntnm99
Reverse KKK? So they are black supremacists? They want to lynch, rape, beat white people? I highly doubt that.
And also, you're right, sometimes the person that is shot maybe was shot within the law. The problem still stands that there are far too many cases of people being shout WITHOUT firearms and WITHOUT criminal records. It still stands that there are far too many cases of black people being beaten and hurt brutally by the police unnecessarily. You'll find many cases online where you have to admit that the force used was unneeded, for example, Jasmin Darwin, Ben Fields and South Carolinian student, Dajerria Becton, Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner and hundreds more.
Also, on your 'unarmed' point, some statistics for you.
Source: https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/unarmed/
Police killed at least 102 unarmed black people in 2015, nearly twice each week.
Nearly 1 in 3 black people killed by police in 2015 were identified as unarmed, though the actual number is likely higher due to underreporting
37% of unarmed people killed by police were black in 2015 despite black people being only 13% of the U.S. population
Unarmed black people were killed at 5x the rate of unarmed whites in 2015
And also, you're right, sometimes the person that is shot maybe was shot within the law. The problem still stands that there are far too many cases of people being shout WITHOUT firearms and WITHOUT criminal records. It still stands that there are far too many cases of black people being beaten and hurt brutally by the police unnecessarily. You'll find many cases online where you have to admit that the force used was unneeded, for example, Jasmin Darwin, Ben Fields and South Carolinian student, Dajerria Becton, Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner and hundreds more.
Also, on your 'unarmed' point, some statistics for you.
Source: https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/unarmed/
Police killed at least 102 unarmed black people in 2015, nearly twice each week.
Nearly 1 in 3 black people killed by police in 2015 were identified as unarmed, though the actual number is likely higher due to underreporting
37% of unarmed people killed by police were black in 2015 despite black people being only 13% of the U.S. population
Unarmed black people were killed at 5x the rate of unarmed whites in 2015
Unarmed is a poor measure because it does two things: assumes somebody is only a threat if they're armed (not true) and it doesn't count people who have been disarmed. When you look through the actual cases that 102 really starts to get whittled down A LOT. You get the people actually going for a weapon, appearing as of they're going for a weapon which constitutes probable cause, it includes accidental discharge (which often is due to a scuffle), it includes accidental collateral (the police may be good shots but that doesn't mean they never miss).
And despite blacks only being 13% of the population they account for over half the homicides, over a third of gang membership, commit nearly 20% of hate crimes (including against themselves to try to frame somebody else).
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by shanktheopps
x
In what ways do you think that Farage would be effective as PM?
How do you think we can offer good trade deals?
What is wrong with Muslims? Why install a blanket ban?
Do you support immigration from the Commonwealth?
How many times a day do you cut yourself on your edginess?
Original post by ntnm99
Reverse KKK? So they are black supremacists? They want to lynch, rape, beat white people? I highly doubt that.
And also, you're right, sometimes the person that is shot maybe was shot within the law. The problem still stands that there are far too many cases of people being shout WITHOUT firearms and WITHOUT criminal records. It still stands that there are far too many cases of black people being beaten and hurt brutally by the police unnecessarily. You'll find many cases online where you have to admit that the force used was unneeded, for example, Jasmin Darwin, Ben Fields and South Carolinian student, Dajerria Becton, Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner and hundreds more.
Also, on your 'unarmed' point, some statistics for you.
Source: https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/unarmed/
Police killed at least 102 unarmed black people in 2015, nearly twice each week.
Nearly 1 in 3 black people killed by police in 2015 were identified as unarmed, though the actual number is likely higher due to underreporting
37% of unarmed people killed by police were black in 2015 despite black people being only 13% of the U.S. population
Unarmed black people were killed at 5x the rate of unarmed whites in 2015
And also, you're right, sometimes the person that is shot maybe was shot within the law. The problem still stands that there are far too many cases of people being shout WITHOUT firearms and WITHOUT criminal records. It still stands that there are far too many cases of black people being beaten and hurt brutally by the police unnecessarily. You'll find many cases online where you have to admit that the force used was unneeded, for example, Jasmin Darwin, Ben Fields and South Carolinian student, Dajerria Becton, Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner and hundreds more.
Also, on your 'unarmed' point, some statistics for you.
Source: https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/unarmed/
Police killed at least 102 unarmed black people in 2015, nearly twice each week.
Nearly 1 in 3 black people killed by police in 2015 were identified as unarmed, though the actual number is likely higher due to underreporting
37% of unarmed people killed by police were black in 2015 despite black people being only 13% of the U.S. population
Unarmed black people were killed at 5x the rate of unarmed whites in 2015
Well they have said and don the things you doubt this link includes videos of from some of blm's protests
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/264277/black-lives-matter-racists-attack-white-people-try-daniel-greenfield
Look at Twitter the next time a white police officer is killed, I was on there when the Dallas shooting happened and they were celebrating.
Do you feel like your islamophobia is going to be a disadvantage when a growing proportion of Britain is Muslim?
(edited 7 years ago)
Do you feel like you have your views just to be controversial because you like the attention it brings you?
Would you prefer a world where people were free to do what they wanted as long as there was no harm upon anyone else or a world where there were strict rules and regulations upon morals and conduct dictated by a government/monarch and any rule breaking was punished proportionally up to the death penalty?
Would you prefer a world where people were free to do what they wanted as long as there was no harm upon anyone else or a world where there were strict rules and regulations upon morals and conduct dictated by a government/monarch and any rule breaking was punished proportionally up to the death penalty?
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by RedManc
I'm not alternative right, I'm alternative left
- I support Donald Trump 50%
- I support Brexit
-I support Labour
- I support a ban on unskilled immigration and repatriation of recent unskilled immigrants
-I support a ban on Muslims and people from majority-Muslim nations entering the UK.
-I support fracking and shale oil extraction
- I oppose BLM and ISIS
- I support Donald Trump 50%
- I support Brexit
-I support Labour
- I support a ban on unskilled immigration and repatriation of recent unskilled immigrants
-I support a ban on Muslims and people from majority-Muslim nations entering the UK.
-I support fracking and shale oil extraction
- I oppose BLM and ISIS
That's more just old school left as opposed to the pacifist tree hugging types of today.
Original post by BigTraderBoi
Do you feel like your islamophobia is going to be a disadvantage when a growing proportion of Britain is Muslim?
Islamophobia is a non-word. It's nonsense.
Original post by RedManc
I'm not alternative right, I'm alternative left
- I support Donald Trump 50%
- I support Brexit
-I support Labour
- I support a ban on unskilled immigration and repatriation of recent unskilled immigrants
-I support a ban on Muslims and people from majority-Muslim nations entering the UK.
-I support fracking and shale oil extraction
- I oppose BLM and ISIS
- I support Donald Trump 50%
- I support Brexit
-I support Labour
- I support a ban on unskilled immigration and repatriation of recent unskilled immigrants
-I support a ban on Muslims and people from majority-Muslim nations entering the UK.
-I support fracking and shale oil extraction
- I oppose BLM and ISIS
Wait, you guys exist? woa. I swear the left must hide you or something we never see you guys out.
Original post by James385
I assumed the lefties are cucks... not the right wing. AKA the male feminists that support a womans right to get ****ed infront of their husband while he wanks off while slitting his wrists.
'Cuck' hasn't meant anything for years. It's the equivalent of saying 'fag' or something, in that it's just overused as a negative word so often that it loses all meaning. I do find it funny that it's the alt-right that have pushed such a word into meaninglessness, though. It reeks of insecurity, denial and overcompensation. Just a little
Original post by Jammy Duel
And despite blacks only being 13% of the population they account for over half the homicides, over a third of gang membership, commit nearly 20% of hate crimes (including against themselves to try to frame somebody else).
Posted from TSR Mobile
And despite blacks only being 13% of the population they account for over half the homicides, over a third of gang membership, commit nearly 20% of hate crimes (including against themselves to try to frame somebody else).
Posted from TSR Mobile
This is a socioeconomic issue, not a race one. This is also my biggest problem with a group like BLM; the focus on race discrimination over class discrimination, where the latter is usually more important. They almost have the right idea, their goals are simply very narrow minded.
Original post by JamesN88
That's more just old school left as opposed to the pacifist tree hugging types of today.
Yes, I'am more of an old school left. I hate the new left, it makes me sick.
Original post by JoshDawg
Wait, you guys exist? woa. I swear the left must hide you or something we never see you guys out.
the left has hid us since the 1980's.They think we are 'unelectable' with middle england.
Original post by XiuXiu
'Cuck' hasn't meant anything for years. It's the equivalent of saying 'fag' or something, in that it's just overused as a negative word so often that it loses all meaning. I do find it funny that it's the alt-right that have pushed such a word into meaninglessness, though. It reeks of insecurity, denial and overcompensation. Just a little
No... A cuck is guy that allows other men to **** his wife. That is still a thing now more then ever. I see that crap all over pages on porn sites. That is just a fact... Quit being a typical ignorant leftie spouting crap you don't know about.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by XiuXiu
This is a socioeconomic issue, not a race one. This is also my biggest problem with a group like BLM; the focus on race discrimination over class discrimination, where the latter is usually more important. They almost have the right idea, their goals are simply very narrow minded.
Poorer Whites and Hispanics are more likely to engage in criminal behaviour than their middle-class counterparts, sure, but they're still not on the level of the Black community. I'm reluctant to call things racial issues very often, I'm an individualist and I think most people's problems are their own. But this is clearly a serious issue facing almost exclusively Black communities in the US.
Original post by James385
No... A cuck is guy that allows other men to **** his wife. That is still a thing now more then ever. I see that crap all over pages on porn sites. That is just a fact... Quit being a typical ignorant leftie spouting crap you don't know about.
Why is your reading comprehension so terrible?
I know what the literal meaning of cuckold is ffs. What I was saying is that the word is so overused that it loses it's original meaning. I used the word 'fag' as an comparison. When I say something like
"give me one ****ing statistic that gives evidence of cuckoldry being more of 'a thing' than it was in the past, fag. And why are you so obsessed with people's fetishes anyway?"
I'm not calling you a homosexual, because the word 'fag' is now so widely used that few people associate it with its actual meaning anymore. It has become desensitized to us. The same can be said for 'cuck'. In both examples, the words are pretty much used to describe "something that I don't like".
Quit being a typical ignorant cuckservative, lacking reading comprehension and spouting conspiracy theories that have no ground in reality
Original post by XiuXiu
Why is your reading comprehension so terrible?
I know what the literal meaning of cuckold is ffs. What I was saying is that the word is so overused that it loses it's original meaning. I used the word 'fag' as an comparison. When I say something like
"give me one ****ing statistic that gives evidence of cuckoldry being more of 'a thing' than it was in the past, fag. And why are you so obsessed with people's fetishes anyway?"
I'm not calling you a homosexual, because the word 'fag' is now so widely used that few people associate it with its actual meaning anymore. It has become desensitized to us. The same can be said for 'cuck'. In both examples, the words are pretty much used to describe "something that I don't like".
Quit being a typical ignorant cuckservative, lacking reading comprehension and spouting conspiracy theories that have no ground in reality
I know what the literal meaning of cuckold is ffs. What I was saying is that the word is so overused that it loses it's original meaning. I used the word 'fag' as an comparison. When I say something like
"give me one ****ing statistic that gives evidence of cuckoldry being more of 'a thing' than it was in the past, fag. And why are you so obsessed with people's fetishes anyway?"
I'm not calling you a homosexual, because the word 'fag' is now so widely used that few people associate it with its actual meaning anymore. It has become desensitized to us. The same can be said for 'cuck'. In both examples, the words are pretty much used to describe "something that I don't like".
Quit being a typical ignorant cuckservative, lacking reading comprehension and spouting conspiracy theories that have no ground in reality
I can't be bothered to read all that shite. I read the last bit though ha. I bet you buy into all of that gender bullbshit. Aka there are like 50 different ones. You do look sort of trans. Anyways transgendered individuals are mentally ill.
Libtard
(edited 7 years ago)
Quick Reply
Latest
Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 2 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 2 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 2 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 2 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
