Uk Has Less Progressive Laws Than Morocco After It Bans The Burqa

Which why we see women in the ISIS-held areas of Syria and Iraq choosing to get shot of full veil garments the minute they have been liberated from IS control, isn't it?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syrian-women-pictured-throwing-off-niqabs-after-their-village-was-freed-from-isis-a7076221.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cxj3rbdFFZU

If you believe women generally wear these abominations out of choice, and are not held in thrall by the male-dominated family, in turn led by fundamentalist Wahhabi and Deobandi imams in Saudi- and Pakistan-funded mosques, you are very naive.

Here's one Moslem woman's view:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1195052/Why-I-British-Muslim-woman-want-burkha-banned-streets.html

and many more:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11120588/Muslim-women-reveal-why-they-wear-the-veil-burqa-school-debate.html

Ironically, ISIS has banned the burkha in some areas, as it represents a security risk (which is, of course, also a potential problem in the west).

Until it can be guaranteed that every woman/child who wears a burka in Britain does so voluntarily

What about naturists, they don't voluntarily wear anything, should we ban all clothes?

After the tube failed to spot a practise IED we need to be vigilant that includes banning disguises such as the burqa and balaclavas

Adding to a list that includes Malaysia and Tunisia. Yet here we are, tolerating women in this country are being put in bags. We can pat ourselves on the back all we like for showing tolerance to intolerance, but women in this country are suffering.

Let's be clear, the burqa is not Islamic, let alone cultural to Muslim majority countries. So let's not cowardly hide behind the moral inconsistencies of multi-culturalism and have a truly progressive multi-ethnic society.

http://thesatedire.com/features/islamophobe-of-the-week/islamophobe-of-the-week-morocco/

Yes it is. Your disagreeing with that Islamic interpretation is irrelevant. The point here is that certain Islamic tendencies ought to be reformed.

The problem with those on the left who wax lyrical on multiculturalism, as you touched upon, is their rather naive understanding of integration. The burqa (and niqab) ought to be exceptions to our freedom of choice in clothing in the same way that most of our choice-based freedoms have harm-based exceptions, including speech and expression. The most common reply is that wearing a burqa harms nobody, despite its being a form of indoctrinated self-harm and that it is in fact harmful to others in its expression of relegating women to invisibility and property. The latter is harmful to new generations, to Western culture, to feminism, to public security, and to our system of ethics. We are past the point where this needs to be debated. The other Abrahamic religions (and feminism itself) have come too far for anyone to take seriously the argument that the burqa is not other-harming and that it does not impede cultural integration. The UK will eventually follow suit, though I wouldn't hold your breath under May's term.

How about a t-shirt with one of these messages?

All gays should be castrated!

Kill the blacks!

Shoot Jeremy Corbyn now!

Deport all Moslems!

Fry a lesbian!

Hitler was right! Gas the Jews!

If someone wants to wear a Burqa they should be allowed to.
If a woman wants to be put into a bag, it's her choice.

Before anyone asks, yes I would also allow people to wear far-right symbols.

I think people need to stop getting angry what other people do with their own bodies.

I am uneasy about clothing bans but I would ban the swastika, for the same reason I would ban the burqa, The burqa, however, is more problematic than a hate symbol. No one is forced to wear the swastika, no one can use the swastika as a disguise to engage in criminal activity and the swastika is not commonly worn in certain areas of the country.

The way the burqa is becoming normalised in the UK is nauseating, at the very least we should condemn it.

Although you seem to have entirely missed the point about it not being Islamic

I would ban the swastika.

If someone wants to wear a Swastika and oust themselves as an anti-semite then they are welcome to.

If someone wants to wear a Burqa they should be allowed to.
If a woman wants to be put into a bag, it's her choice.

Before anyone asks, yes I would also allow people to wear far-right symbols.

I think people need to stop getting angry what other people do with their own bodies.

How about a t-shirt with one of these messages?

All gays should be castrated!

Kill the blacks!

Shoot Jeremy Corbyn now!

Deport all Moslems!

Fry a lesbian!

Hitler was right! Gas the Jews!

What about walking around naked?

The swastika, in its unrotated form, is neither a symbol of anti-semitism nor of hatred, but of good luck. You will find it in temples in Korea and India, commonly on Buddhist, Jainist, American Indian and Hindu artifacts, in British banks, on the outside of the India High Commission's building in Aldwych, London and plenty of other public buildings in Britain, including municipal buildings, None of these sympathisse with the nazis or their doctrines.

Carlsberg used it as their logo and there is still one to be found on its Danish HQ.

The Theosophical Society uses it on its seal, and even the British druids used it.

I guess there are hygiene issues associated with that.

This reads like the tracklist of my debut mixtape. 🔥🔥

Regardless of its heritage, the swastika is most definitely now an anti-semitic symbol.