Would you consider this rape?

I would if they had discussed it beforehand and she was clear that she didn't want to have unprotected sex. If she didn't, that would be stretching things. If he was a murderer but didn't disclose this to her, could she accuse him of rape because she wouldn't have had sex with him if she had known his background? It feels like a slippery slope in this case.

I agree with you here. I had a discussion today about it and some were saying it'd be rape regardless of whether or not she stated that she wanted protection or not .

Here are some articles to acknowledge -

http://www.newstalk.com/Man-in-Switzerland-convicted-for-rape-for-taking-off-condom-during-sex-

http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/11/man-guilty-of-rape-after-having-unprotected-sex-without-telling-woman-6375798/

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201701111049497744-swiss-rape-removing-condom-sex/

If you didn't get that, a man and women met on Tinder which eventually lead to intercourse. The man decides to take off the condom during the act unbeknownst to the woman. I presume the woman took it to court asserting that she wouldn't have had sex with him without protection. What's your take on it?

Only if it means women who lie about being on the pill are guilty of rape too.

She was willingly having sex with him, though. It's just the removal of the condom that's the issue. Hmm, doesn't really sound like rape to me.

If it's judged to be rape, it could set a risky precedent. Condoms can often fall off during sex. When this happens, you'd become an accidental rapist.

Even if it was agreed upon beforehand, I'm still not entirely sure. She continued having sex with him and didn't notice? Okay, maybe. But that makes things trickier in court, and could again set some risky precedents concerning things agreed upon before having sex. Could this be a slippery slope? Would it be rape if a woman told me she'd only have sex with me with my socks off, but unbeknownst to her I leave them on?

The 'sock' comparison isn't even remotely the same.

It's similar, it's the woman consenting to sex under one condition.

Where then do we draw the line? Is it rape to lie to a woman about your wealth?

Not really, since taking a sock off can't lead to pregnancy or contracting STD's.

Plus, did I say it was rape? No, I didn't.

Chill, stop being so confrontational.

Yeah, taking socks off has no risk unlike taking off a condom, but it's still the woman only consenting if that condition was met.

Where do you draw the line?

It's similar, it's the woman consenting to sex under one condition.

Where then do we draw the line? Is it rape to lie to a woman about your wealth?