Decision: Rejected (from pool, after re-interview)
Course: Law
College: Downing originally, re-interviewed at Selwyn (on the 12th)
Offer Conditions: N/A
How did you first hear and when? (email/letter/owl): Email from Selwyn - Downing will send me the official rejection letter later on.
Optional
Home, EU or International (Country): Home, England
School Type (Private/State/Grammar/other): State
GCSE Grades: A*x3, Ax8, Bx1
AS Subjects & Grades: AAAA (Government in Politics (100% UMS!), Economics, History, English Literature)
A2 Predictions: A*A*A (Government and Politics, History, Economics respectively)
Reflection
Strengths: ability to talk clearly, good AS grades, willingness to expand upon & modify points
Weaknesses: GCSE grades, lack of prior contact with genuine legal passages (I've read legislation before, but I don't think I ever had to really think about it, so...), and probably many other things I can't think of at the moment!
Interview Assessment: First one at Downing went awfully - I could not, for the life of me, decipher the passage they had given me (in interview, so I had no time to look at it beforehand). Second one went better; I love discussing my own ideas and the practical implementation of legislation in cases, and this gave me a chance to do that. First interview at Selwyn was more general, and I loved it; discussing the jobs of lawyers was a major part of it that I enjoyed. Second one not so good - again, I just found the legislation that I had been given really tried my ability to think outside the box.
Why did you chose your college?: I've heard excellent things about Downing (and Selwyn!) for Law; I kind of just took a few that I had heard similar things about and narrowed it down from there!
Where else did you apply?: Exeter (AAA), Warwick (AAA), Lancaster (AAB), Leicester (Unconditional)
If you were rejected, which uni is benefiting from Cambridge’s oversight?: Exeter, definitely.
General Comments & Advice: Keep an open mind. Cambridge ATs and those who interview you know the university better than you ever will, probably - when you've been rejected, you've been rejected for a reason. It's not because you're "worse than the rest", or because your grades weren't high enough: It's because they know the university, and they don't think it's what would be best for you. Of course, this is advice for those who have been rejected, but hey, I'm in that position. I'm keeping myself going by knowing that, at the end of the day, there's a very, very good reason they've rejected you, especially if you got invited to interview (or twice, in my case!), and it likely has absolutely nothing to do with anything you could reasonably change. The application process is entirely holistic, and different every single year - 2 years ago, my school sent 7 students to Oxbridge; this year, 7 applied, and none got in. It's not about fitting into a cookie-cut 'Cambridge student' shape, it's about whether or not their style of teaching is for you... And considering you've never gone to their university before, it's a safe bet that they can judge that better than you.
Any official feedback received from your college: Will edit when I have it!