Which do you think is the most important science?

Ahem.

Philosophy

But Philosophy isn't a science...

But evil motivations.......that's biology.

Also Maths. 'Coz when mankind couldn't count beyond 4, they stayed in the cave instead of developing more sophisticated societies which then waged war on each other.

o rly?

Tell that to Newton.

Back the in Newton's time, Humanities was supreme and a gentleman learned this before he's allowed to get anywhere near the science. Also back then, religion (theology) was considered very important, too.

But today, Humanities (where Philosophy sits) and Science (Maths, Physics etc) are separate fields.

Without philosophy there is no science. It's at the heart of all knowledge.

Principia is a philosophy text. clue is in the title.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Man is an example of biology, man existing and thinking isn't a scientific application of biology.



The materials and chemicals aren't evil, mans motives when developing them were. I'm still sticking with more evil having been done with scientific advancements in the field of chemistry, and more scientific advancements in the field of chemistry come from evil motivations than the other sciences.

Man is applying his thinking and ingenuity to make those things which isn't possible without biology.

It's not science though.

The chemical and biological processes that keep a man alive and allow him to make decisions and think isn't science? Better tell the biologists that!

these are the subject of scientific enquiry but are not themselves Science. Science is a method not a thing.

The chemical and biological processes that keep a man alive and allow him to make decisions and think isn't science? Better tell the biologists that!

Something just being, isn't a science. So we are examples of biology. The science is in studying and understanding that biology. We do what we do regardless of if we have the science to understand it. So saying man is evil, man is biology, so biology is evil is a false conclusion.

Materials and chemicals still exist naturally. Studying and understanding them is the science of chemistry. We then use that understanding to create better ways of killing each other. The science of chemistry directly contributes towards evil acts.

I'm not really saying biology is evil, it's more parodying your ridiculous assertion that it's chemistry in and of itself that kills people.

No, that's once again false. The scientific method is just studying things and can of itself not kill anyone, including the study of chemistry. You're trying to have your cake and eat it here. If you're claiming it's chemical processes that are used in weapons that kill people and thus chemistry is bad, then I can say it's biological processes in man's body that allows him to make things that kill people etc. There is no real difference in the reasoning.

Also, have you not heard of biological warfare?

Yeah that's true you can then say that for Physics as well.