"let's make the rich poorer to help the poor" (because simply giving people who are bad with money isn't going to make them wealthy)
that's always worked in the past, hasn't it. what a fantastic idea.
I mean, why stop there? why not break the legs of the best basketball teams to make the worst teams better.
that's *sure* to make the worst basketball team an objectively better team, right? ohhhhh wait
what does this gap mean other than the fact that some people are simply *really* rich?
it certainly doesn't mean the the poor are getting progressively poorer. it's the opposite case all over the world.
is this to imply that they've unfairly taken that wealth *from* the poor?
no? so what does the wealth gap represent? our jealousy? inequality of brilliance?
I mean, what else can we infer? theft? or the market?