Trump and Obama

Of course I didn't back austerity in 2010, because I knew it was a bad idea. That's what the IMF and OECD ended up admitting.

'B.

You have literally taken one of my points, changed 'Keynes' to 'Friedman' and repeated it to me.
Ignored =/= addressed and disproved all of them with indisputable evidence.


Of course I didn't back austerity in 2010, because I knew it was a bad idea. That's what the IMF and OECD ended up admitting.

'Backed up' does not mean make random statements with no evidence and gaping holes in its premise.



This, for example, had none of its points backed up with evidence. This was the case with the vast, vast majority of your posts.

Of course I copied over the same thing, because you kept ignoring it, which is why I won.
The real delusion would be thinking that you were successful in that debate in any way.

@That Bearded Man here you go as you asked for evidence
Here is my source,
http://www.politico.eu/article/labour-recovery-uk-election-blair/
The fact is they inherited an excellent , stable economy with the deficit falling.

Further sources confirming John Major did a good job and Blair inherited a good economy:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/12/john-major-made-olympic-success-possible
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/9185917/Its-time-to-give-John-Major-the-credit-we-so-cruelly-denied-him.html
By 1997 employment was rising, growth stable, and the deficit was well under control, meaning that Gordon Brown as chancellor inherited the most benign economic scenario for any British government of the last century.
Perhaps you could tell us a better economy inherited post WW II than the one Blair inherited?


The fact is labour was running a deficit pre 2008 when they shouldn't have.
"From Sweden to Australia, sensible governments paid down debt in the boom years. Labour didn’t. Blair offers his own definition: a ‘cyclically-adjusted current Budget balance’. Yes, you really need to play with words to hide the basic fact that Blair and Brown were borrowing like there’s no tomorrow. Here’s a chart showing the gap between what Labour spent, and what it received in tax. After April 2001, Labour simply gave up on balanced budgets."(Quote from http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2013/04/tony-blair-cant-escape-blame-for-the-debt/)



Really? I haven't avoided any points.



Really? Perhaps show the memepage I've used. I haven't used one, by all means look for it and show where I've copied. You have no evidence to show this.

Lol , ask me to back up a claim and go back it up for me. Thanks!! I found the article as well !
https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-prime-ministers/john-major

Yes, Labour ran a deficit when they could've maintained a surplus,

LOL , so as they were wrong once , they can be wrong again. So now the IMF side with you , they are right? Hypocritical. They could be wrong about keynesian economics.

I don't really mind right wing keynesian economics though , lets see how Trump fares

So it seems I did back up my points so its you who are delusional
As Prime Minister Sir John Major oversaw Britain's longest period of continuous economic growth

(Don't copy's and paste from the guardian saying this web to into public services and somebody other lefty ball crap, it doesn't change the fact)
So yes I clearly did show evidence
Changing keynes to Friedman is still a valid point
There you go , the Texas sharpshooter is at work again @Connor27
You also got completely outclassed by @heri2rs
Even the former labour leader @That Bearded Man despite disagreeing with me admits I used evidence.
I have never read a more moronic argument in my life , please do sit back and winge as the left continues to loose.
Capitalism is great, Capitalism is winning. All you can do is winge about it.
I amazed our deputy prime minister is so stupid and I look forward to ousting you in May.

That's not even a point. You're not helping yourself here.

Your dedication to economic policies on the pure basis of them being 'right-wing' is farcical.



And the typical random outburst with weak claims and no valid points.
You claimed to have backed up all of your points, that was one of the few had attempts at evidence, but the points themselves were poor.

And now you retreat by tagging in others to fight your battle for you and turning their arguments into soundbites because it is an indefensible position.

Your propaganda on socialism also have no grounding in fact, they are typical right-wing rhetoric.

I will repeat my earlier statement: stop making random claims and arguments when you clearly have no significant knowledge on the subject, nor any skill in presenting a valid argument.

LOL i cant take you seriously after you literally made a spelling error while calling me stupid . Its youre not your , you mongoloid. Basic things

but the points themselves were poor.

Your dedication to economic policies on the pure basis of them being 'right-wing' is farcical.



And the typical random outburst with weak claims and no valid points.
You claimed to have backed up all of your points, that was one of the few had attempts at evidence, but the points themselves were poor.

Again dodged all the points like you normally do.
Actually your laughable I backed all my points up with graphs and links and you say oh you didn't back your points up. The point you picked above was clearly backed by several sources including Goc.uk, I have highlighted it in bold but you appear to b blind.I'll repeat myself stop copying and pasting the guardian and passing It of as your own!
Its a worry we have a deputy prime minister so aggressive, intent on personal attacks, blind and can't even debate himself and when he looses ( Just because some biased lefties said you won your ego is up), goes on a rant. You obviously have no knowledge on the subject either as you resort to copy and paste. Again other posters have out classed you , this doesn't mean I'm tagging people in to fight for me , it still means you got owned by @heri2rs , dodged all his points as well as mine and you look like a complete and utter moron. I hope your ousted in a few months time
Even nutjobs like Ben Carson are smarter than you , I can't even take you seriously for a second.
Posted from TSR Mobile

T, I'll repeat: that was one of the few had attempts at evidence.

but the points themselves were poor.

Insults are not a valid form of argument either.

. His point was fundamentally flawed as I pointed out.

You were the one who started personal attacks, not me

Now your making up stuff , you addressed one of his points weakly and ignored the rest.

Oh and every example you were given were just an 'exception' or 'rare' . Its funny how you claim I didn't back my points up when I clearly did. If you want articles for some points and I can happily link you to them but I don't think that adds much to the debate.

Biased left wing opinion

My taughts exactly but straight back at you

You sound like a 12 year old who hasn't yet discovered the phrase "I know you are but what am I".

This sums up your approach to the entire debate.

My taughts exactly but straight back at you

That makes no sense , its just babble like you have the whole debate.
Hats of to you though , you finally didn't copy and paste!

And which of your students will be delivering this damning condemnation?

It does make sense to those with an IQ higher than 10.

Come back when you can actually spell and understand how economics work.

Des' back up has arrived , now I'm actually scared