2017 Oxford Prospective Students [part 2]

Absolutely! And I think this might be even more relevant for us international students, coming from academic background where the only thing associated with Oxbridge are big blockbuster movies and romanticized gothic buildings - and most of us end up doing the whole application process without guidance. Personally, I knew where I screwed up, and I even ended up changing my course. Nevertheless, you have to be sure that there is a chance, and that you are willing to spend a year taking that chance. It is not for everyone. Many people who are rejected post-interview are not rejected due to their academic incompetence, but rather because they do not fit the tutorial system, so I think you have to have a strong sense of integrity when taking the reapplying decision as well - don't go throwing yourself under the bus if you just dodged the bullet.

Email here.

sorry if you've said it before but what did they say? if you want you can quote your previous post if youve already answered this

i think this info will be of interest to you oxford folk, my friend just got his feedback from @BrasenoseAdm and they told him he was rejected pre interview because he had 7A*'s 3A's and they only called people with 8A*'s for interview. some context: he applied for law and had AAAA in AS

that won't be the sole reason they didn't invite him, perhaps a contributing factor but not the sole reason - and that will have been taken out of context, they would have invited people with less a*'s who are in relatively poorly performing schools as well, perhaps his school's average was 9a*s at gcse... it probably isn't but I would be very surprised if the only reason for rejection was having one less a* at gcse, even if he was from an underperforming school and had a fantastic LNAT score, something which they are MUCH more likely to set a cut off score for

idk if it's true but he said the college told him they only called people to interview that had 8A*'s or above. sounds kind of ridiculous but thats what he said (and btw the school he is from is international and doesnt have such a high A* average)

Hello Student1256,

The actual phrase used in the letters we've sent so far is:

"In the absence of mitigating factors, candidates who achieved fewer than
8A*s at GCSE or less than 23 in the multiple choice and 62 in the essay part of the LNAT were not selected for interview, although strong performance in one or the other component was relied on to compensate weakness in the other."

This is certainly true of our applicants. For reference of the 29 candidates we interviewed (for which GCSE data is available for 21 - the others will have not sat GCSEs), 7 had fewer than 8 A*s. In most of these cases, they had achieved highly in the LNAT, however mitigating circumstances (such as poor average school performance, illness, bereavement, teaching issues) could mean that they might be invited to interview even if their LNAT score was nearer the threshold.

Brasenose Admissions

btw can someone who isnt applying to oxford sit one of their exams such as MAT? just for an extra qualification; just wondering. does oxford release the results of MAT like STEP?

@BrasenoseAdm if my college hasn't yet given me feedback (ie MAT score) would you recommend asking again? Basically are they likely to have forgotten about me?

Posted from TSR Mobile

@BrasenoseAdm if my college hasn't yet given me feedback (ie MAT score) would you recommend asking again? Basically are they likely to have forgotten about me?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Won't let me tag on mobile, could someone else have a go?

Posted from TSR Mobile

The standard policy is to provide feedback within 20 working days under normal circumstances. We would suggest waiting until this time period has elapsed and then writing to ask when you might expect a feedback letter.

Do undergrad students also need to fill out a financial declaration form for Oxford?

Yeah, I've been sent one by my college