This is quite far down in this thread so I doubt anyone will read it. I don't know much about Tomi Lahren so won't comment on her, but Milo.....
I think people are just wasting their time getting so annoyed and offended by him. He is a self-confessed professional troll who just says outrageous stuff for street credibility. Some of what he says, such as his criticism of feminism, is agreeable to an extent. He then uses his 'okay' points as hooks, by which to hang his ridiculous statements like 'Lesbians aren't real'.
He uses his status as a gay man of Jewish descent as a defence against being called a racist or homophobic, despite making evidently anti-semitic and homophobic remarks. Very anachronistic to say the least. Moreover, he says these things because in my opinion he is insecure about who he is. He bleaches his hair and skin to make himself look like Adolf Hitler's wet dream as opposed to the Le Happy Merchant, and calls himself a 'dangerous £aggot' - all part of a plot to try and claim that the conservative right stands for minorities, which by and large it doesn't.
He makes a few valid points, but then descends into lunacy. His whole image is based on the notion of charismatic authority. Because of this charismatic authority, any bat$hit crazy statements are seen as legitimate and not called into question. Some of what he says though is rather messed up, but you can never really tell if he is serious of just taking the piss. Should his claim that he lost his virginity aged 13 in a fivesome with some 'very young' people be called out due to paedophilic undertones? Or should it just be dismissed as garbage?
Generally speaking, though, we should stop b1tching about Milo and instead criticise the general narrative of his ilk from an intellectual stance - something the left are failing to do and need to sort out.