Ocr as law sources of law predictions?

What is your prediction on what is going to come up on the G152 sources of law paper ?

If Precedent doesn't come up for the 4th year in a row i think i may just leave the country

Unlucky mate.

Tell me about it, statutory interpretation for the fourth year in a row, i was re-sitting to improve my C just gonna have to do well in my g153 and 4

my college didn't teach us EU law and poorly taught statutory interpretations, so our whole year and upper year resits got screwed, just wanted to know what your college didn't teach because apparently each college just doesn't teach one topic?

my college didnt teach EU law either for the 3 5 mark questions what was your answers intrinsic aids or extrinsic?

Tell me about it, statutory interpretation for the fourth year in a row, i was re-sitting to improve my C just gonna have to do well in my g153 and 4

Rah that's deep, you can't even resit. I was planning my resit the second i opened that question booklet.

You needed to state what type of intrinsic or extrinsic aids. The first 5 marker was hansard (extrinsic aid), the second one was previous case law (extrinsic aid)-for this one you could also use intrinsic aids such as preamble long titles and short titles of previous case law to find out what was contained in the consolidating statute, and the third one was law reform reports such as from the royal or law commission (extrinsic aid).

So unhappy judicial precedent didn't come up though but thankfully i realized i could use some similar evaluation in cii) when the source mentioned the mischief rule resulting in judicial law making.

so for the 2nd 5 marker could you also state it was an intrinsic aid

The mark scheme may allow this with valid justification because the judge wanted to find out more about a consolidating statute so could look for features within the statute.

However this was the most appropriate way to go about the 2nd 5 marker ; first i stated that an extrinsic aid of previous case law should be used (this was the critical point=3 marks), then I stated this is because a consolidating statute is a number of Acts of parliament compiled into one Act so these acts could be researched individually (this is the reason "why", then I stated that intrinsic aids such as preamble, long titles, short titles etc could be used within the previous case law to grasp the context of what would be in the consolidating statute (this would be a further elaboration point which would achieve the final mark).

Hope this helps

so would i only get one mark for saying it was an intrinsic aid and why