If you really wanna tweak anything, i would reduce the amount of "this can be seen...". Use a synonym like "this is evident when" or "this is displayed through". Also 'idiotic' is too critical, change it to 'foolish'
I sat my paper with OCR, and they love it when you integrate quotes as best as you can. I imagine you would get more marks for it for AQA too, and even if you don't, it reads better. It's easier to do it with short quotes rather than longer ones. So for example you could say
He believes that "there isn't a chance of war" since "the world's developing so fast that it'll make war impossible". Here, the fact that he....It sounds more natural than just saying
"this can be seen in the quotation 'There isn't a chance of war'". If you can read the sentence aloud without knowing its a quote, then that's natural and good in an essay.
Onto more pressing matters. I know your essay is a bit full, but i cannot emphasise how much you need a paragraph on how he is presented as uncaring. Fit this in, perhaps as your first paragraph.
Mr Birling is presented as insensitive, displayed in his reaction to the Inspector's news of a suicide, when Birling says, "(rather impatiently)", "Yes, yes. Horrid business. But I don't understand why you should come here, Inspector". Immediately his indifference towards Eva's death generates irritation from the audience. The repetition of 'yes' indicates that he is trying to brush away the topic by hurrying the Inspector. And so, although he feigns care, calling it "horrid business", the abruptness of starting the next line with the co-ordinating conjunction "But" highlights his real concern is over why the Inspector came to his house, rather than any sympathy for the death of the girl. This is further bolstered by how he spoke "impatiently", implying that this lower class girl's suicide does not merit any of his attention or time. Priestley utilises Mr Birling as an embodiment for the lack of sympathy the upper class had for the workers at the time. This lack of care resulted in deep-rooted class divisions, where the rich like the Birlings led comfortable lives while the poor suffered greatly with no one to help. This problem is one that Priestley urges the audience to address in his play, by promoting Socialism and mutual responsibility over the flawed Capitalism that Mr Birling endorses.
This PEA includes analysis of structure (beginning a sentence with But and repetition) and language (impatiently) and techniques too. It also mentions relevant context. In your essay you have addressed how he is self-confident, arrogant, foolish and even sneaky. But in terms of how Priestley presents Birling, none of this matters until we see what Birling did wrong. He was callous and cold towards Eva and all his workers and the lower class, which is what deserves our hatred. It's all well and good saying that he is 'striking', 'conniving', 'idiotic', 'selfish', 'arrogant', 'insecure'. This makes us hate him. But the reason for us hating his character is because of how cruel he was to the lower class, something Priestley presents through Mr Birling's careless attitude towards those he considers beneath him. I think this is what your essay is lacking, and until you add it, you can't really say in your conclusion that there is massive disparity between classes, and his audience need to change their ways to rebuild a war-torn Britain. The only way you can say this is if you show what
attitudes and ways need to be changed (the carelessness and lack of sympathy).Ill show you an example of what i mean. You said this:
'Priestley emphasises Birling's selfishness and arrogance by using the Inspector as Birling's antithesis. This can be seen through the use of Juxtaposition between the inspector and Birling and through the use of personal pronouns. Birling uses the personal pronouns 'I... me... mine' frequently, whilst the Inspector uses 'our...we...ourselves' instead. Priestley does this to paint Capitalism in a bad light, exploiting the audience to make them decide between Capitalism (which is depicted as bad) and Socialism (which is depicted as good).'Firstly juxtaposition isn't really an ideal word here - contrast would be better. Although less fancy, juxtaposition should be reserved for words which have interesting placement when placed together (in one sentence). The personal pronouns were not close together in one quote, they are scattered throughout the play. Therefore it's a general contrast. Also, yes it's true that the Inspector is his antithesis and
foil (i attached a link below for this word for you) but simply contrasting their use of personal pronouns does not in itself paint Capitalism in a bad light. If you want to do this, you have to either first show HOW the Inspector champions socialism (which comes up heavily in Act 3, less so in Act 1, e.g. with 'We do not live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for eachother."
. But since your essay is focused on Act 1, it's harder to show how socialism is good, so show how capitalism is bad. Do this through the quote i gave you, showing the upper class business men to be careless. Or pick one of the other countless quotes that portrays Mr Birling as a selfish evil capitalist in Act 1, then you can safely say Priestley wanted to show Capitalism as being bad, and socialism as being good. You cannot simply infer that Capitalism is bad just because Mr Birling is foolish for saying the titanic is 'unsinkable', or because he is arrogant.
Irresponsibility and lack of sympathy are the two biggest reasons to hate Mr Birling, and you need to focus first and foremost on this. Really good quotes include:
- The one in my example
- "If we were all responsible for everything that happened to everybody we'd had anything to do with, it would be very awkward, wouldn't it?" - this is such an easy quote to analyse for both content (what it literally says) and for language/structure. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY is the a very very very big theme, if not the biggest, in An Inspector Calls. (The main themes, for future reference, are 1. Responsibility 2. Class 3. Age 4. Gender. There might be more, but nothing as big as those). Mr Birling refuses to accept his responsibility not only in Eva's death, but in SOCIETY, and this is want Priestley wants to expose. A good quote for future reference is: "(massively) Public men, Mr Birling, have responsibilities as well as privileges". Said by the Inspector himself. (Not so relevant in your essay though, just for future)
- "If you don't come down sharply on some of these people, they'd soon be asking for the earth". This literally summarises his capitalistic views - every man for himself. He fears the advancement of those below him, those who he needed to exploit in order to be where he is now. This fear is captured in this quote especially: "She'd had a lot to say - far too much - so she had to go". This is a quote when he explains why he fired her in Act 1. Quite tautologic, expressing his fear, as well as the fragmented sentence structure.
- he doesn't want to be "mixed up together like bees in a hive - community and all that nonsense". This quote highlights his complete rejection of Socialism. Priestley presents Mr Birling as an avid critic and objector to Socialism. That is a point in how he is presented. Another point in how he is presented, which is the essay title, is how he is a Capitalist. In the end, its a play on Capitalism vs Socialism, so focus on these themes. This quote is so easy to get analysis points for: the simile of bees, where everyone is workers (except the queen's requisite leadership), where there is
little hierarchy to abuse. Furthermore Birling reject's the idea of "community" - this isn't an ideal exclusive to socialism, its an ideal present in every belief and
community, but the fact that he rejects even the notion of being linked and responsible for others conveys him in a very selfish light, without a care for those around him.
To summarise, give us a reason to hate capitalism, which i don't think you have done yet.
'I believe that Priestley does this to criticise Capitalism and subconsciously turn the audience away from Capitalist values.' Why?'
Priestley does this to paint Capitalism in a bad light' Why?????'To make them decide between Capitalism (which is depicted as bad)' How is it depicted as bad??'believed that Capitalism was a real threat to society' You explain what Priestley intended in a wider context, but you didn't show how it was a threat to society in the play itself. Mr Birling being arrogant and insecure and whatever doesn't matter until you tell us what he did WRONG so we can hate him for being arrogant and selfish and insecure and be put off by him and his ideals.
Lastly, '
those who thought they were the hierarchy of society,' They themselves are not the hierarchy of society (that doesn't make sense). They can be at the top of it, though.
Considering you have studied AIC for less than a year, what you have is really good. Although in an essay you want to talk about the major themes. sociaaaaaalllll responsibilittyyyyy
Sorry for very very very long reply! Good luck with any final edits.
Also, google 'foil literary term'.Foil: Better term than antithesis when you aren't actually comparing two solid quotes, one from Birling one from Inspector. So if you just want to talk about the Inspector being his opposite in general, say he is his foil.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=foil+english+literary+terms&oq=foil&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59j0l4.2005j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8