The first question was so ambiguous! People in my class put nominal/quantitative and primary data so no one really had any idea :/ really happy nothing on the biological approach for OCD came up other than the multiple choice though ...

Reply 6

Katiead

I put primary data for question 1, it wasn't very specific and loads of people put nominal as well :\

Reply 7

Shawn Adams

Original post by Bristow98

It's 3 evaluation points for 8 markers unless there's a stem

I'm ****ed. For one of the 8 markers I gave fully detailed A01 but only 1 A03 point (due to time). The other 8 marker I did the same but 2 A03 points. The exam went pretty well overall tho. I expect a high B/low A

Reply 8

77GEO

What did anyone put for how to deal with independent measure? I put they could use matched pairs? But others put random allocation? Any ideas

Reply 9

Carlyanna_1

I put quantitative and nominal just to be safe haha and i put matched pairs where they can match ppts on a variable e.g. how much social approval matters to them to reduce participant variables :smile:

Reply 10

nealej

Original post by 77GEO

What did anyone put for how to deal with independent measure? I put they could use matched pairs? But others put random allocation? Any ideas

Everyone in my class put matched pairs

Reply 11

Millie.hs

For the 8 markers I wrote two evaluation points because it look me a while to elaborate on them.. will that be okay?

Reply 12

Carlyanna_1

Original post by Millie.hs

For the 8 markers I wrote two evaluation points because it look me a while to elaborate on them.. will that be okay?

My teachers told me that 2 fully explained evaluation points would be fine for an 8 marker :smile:

Reply 13

Millie.hs

Original post by Carlyanna_1

My teachers told me that 2 fully explained evaluation points would be fine for an 8 marker :smile:

thanks! that's a relief 😅

Reply 14

Caraeloise

For question 1 I put categorical data, hopefully that's right as it's the same way of saying nominal. When do you think the unofficial mark scheme will be released?

Reply 15

kleach12

Question 1 was based on research methods like the others within social influence and so was more about whether the data was quantitative an quantitative. The tricky stem meant you had to read carefully because questionnaires are qualitative data but the thing the research was measuring was the amount of questionnaires answered.

Reply 16

Shawn Adams

Original post by 77GEO

What did anyone put for how to deal with independent measure? I put they could use matched pairs? But others put random allocation? Any ideas

I put Repeated measures with counterbalancing. It's right, I checked the book. A strength of repeated measures is it reduces participant variables as the same ppl take part it all conditions. Matched pairs is correct too

Reply 17

tamsinj98

What did everyone write for the 16 marker at the end? Didn't seem as though there was enough content to write 16 marks on deviation from ideal mental health and inability to function?

Reply 18

tamsinj98

Original post by Shawn Adams

oooo thank you very much I was panicking so much about putting matched pairs!

Reply 19

Mrtoyk182

It's right but the question specifically asked for independent groups design so the answer is random allocation.

Feel free to correct me

Posted from TSR Mobile