Vehicle collides with pedestrians in London Finsbury Park

People be reaching today. Sometimes I really hate this forum.

Posted from TSR Mobile

When did I ever say it was limited to just killing?

The person who did this was a WHITE MAN. This was an Islamophobic terrorist attack.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Islamophobia is a much bigger problem in the UK than so-called "Islamic terrorism".

Waiting for right-wingers to condemn this attack and explain what they have tried to do to stop this man

You didn't, but then doesn't that mean we can't wholly blame people for their actions.

The law currently provides concessions to those who are deemed to be mentally unfit. Do you feel these should apply to everyone or should they be scrapped altogether (you mentioned you don't want diminished responsibility in this case)?

But that's the point. People who have some measure of support for his actions or motivations might not condemn it.

If you ask an alt-rightist to condemn this and they refuse, then you can legitimately assume that they might have some measure of support for their actions or motivations.

It works just as well both ways.

White people who say this was a revenge attack are literally terrorist sympathisers and apologists but would never be labelled that

Do you not like it when ppl preach?

Well it is different if you condemn the actions but aren't public with your condemnation, and actually not condemning the action.

Finding Muslims for example who didn't condemn the London Bridge attacks would have been like finding a needle in a haystack (unless you lived in Syria). But there were some who criticised Muslims for not going out and marching for example (although I know there were some demonstrations/walks from various groups).

I am not going to ask you guys to go publicly condemn the guy though, but some were asking just that of Muslims (and to be fair a lot of them did, including many scholars). Sorry but Isis won't change their mind because we called them terrorists.

I said reach

Posted from TSR Mobile

I assume that everyone's default position is one of condemnation - why wouldn't it be?
The point was about those who explicitly refuse to condemn such events, even when asked, whatever their political or religious position.

BTW, you can find people who explicitly refused to condemn the Manchester and London attacks on ISOC, right here on TSR.

White people who say this was a revenge attack are literally terrorist sympathisers and apologists but would never be labelled that

Why is trying to understand someone's motives labelled as a terrorist sympathiser?

Simply condemming their actions and hoping it won't happen again is tantamount to burying one's head in the sand no?

By understanding the motivation behind such attrosities it surely gives us the ability to counter such ideas head on?

This is a callous terrorist attack and I am shocked at the low level of media coverage of this attack. Westminster, Manchester and London Bridge received full time coverage. This is hardly a headline

The person who did this was a WHITE MAN. This was an Islamophobic terrorist attack.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Islamophobia is a much bigger problem in the UK than so-called "Islamic terrorism".

Amber Rudd Home Secretary says it's NOT a terror attack.

Why?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Omg,some of the white supremacists on this thread justifying the attack make me feel so
(You know who you are)

Go **** yourselfs.

As for the The attack. Something needs to be done against the rise of anti Muslim hatred. They are the largest victims of terrorism. Much love <3

It's Amber Rudd.